> -Original Message-
> From: William Dunlap
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 10:15 AM
> To: 'Sundar Dorai-Raj'; r-de...@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: RE: [Rd] update.formula and backticked colons
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
> > [mailto:r-devel-bo
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Sundar Dorai-Raj
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 2:28 PM
> To: r-de...@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: [Rd] update.formula and backticked colons
>
> I just noticed the following i
You can always check the list archives (the ETHZ ones): it did make
it. See the thread starting at
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2009-July/054184.html
I need to look more carefully, but this is not what ... is documented
to do and it would need to be an extra argument for this method
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Sundar Dorai-Raj wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Sundar Dorai-Raj wrote:
>> I just noticed the following in update.formula and I'm wondering if
>> this behavior is the intention of the developers. Here's an example:
>>
>> update(`a: b` ~ x, ~ . + y)
>>
>>
Carlos J. Gil Bellosta wrote:
Hello,
The issue is no longer an issue concerning my package as I have
changed the part that drives the error (for unrelated reasons).
It is true that I might have done a greater effort to make the package
fully cross-platform. I did R-CMD-checks on Unbuntu and C
Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Jul 30, 2009, at 7:33 , Carlos J. Gil Bellosta wrote:
Dear Uwe,
The thing that I find funny is that the check of the package on
Windows for R 2.10.x works on r-forge as you can see here:
http://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=426&log=check_x86_32_windows&pkg=colby
Hi,
you can compute cumsums for each row with
t(apply(x, 1, cumsum))
As this is a simple, direct implementation, I see no reason to make it
a named function.
Cheers
-Felix
2009/7/31 Christophe Dutang :
> Dear list,
>
> Don't you think it could be useful to have in R base a function
> rowCumSums,
