[Rd] can't use ATLAS or ACML | 2.9.0

So, tried again from scratch. Again, CentOS 5.3, which is essentially RHEL 5.3. ./configure --with-blas="-L/opt/acml4.3.0/gfortran64/lib -lacml" In config.log, get things like configure:37199: checking for dgemm_ in -L/opt/acml4.3.0/gfortran64/lib -lacml configure:37230: gcc -std=gnu99 -o con

[Rd] proper link to ACML blas | compiling 2.9.0

Normally, I do the following to configure R for compilation on my Opteron box with ACML installed: ./configure --with-tcltk --with-blas="-L/opt/acml4.3.0/gfortran64/lib -lacml" However, when I do so, and look at Makeconf, I see BLAS_LIBS = -lblas I thought I would see BLAS_LIBS = -L/opt/ac

[Rd] ready to toss the towel | lapack and 2.9.0

Well, I've now tried just about every permutation I can think of - including using the ATLAS lapack (instead of generic), in various combinations with ACML, or generic BLAS, or ATLAS blas. No matter what I do, so long as I have lapack of any flavour, I get the 'stats error' with make check. And

[Rd] 2.9.0 and make check errors | mystery deepens

So, I tried the following configure: ./configure --with-lapack --with-blas --with-tcltk No use of ACML at all, but both lapack and blas. Configure proceeds without any errors. Make, same thing. Make check - same problem with stats. But, this time a .fail file got created in tests/Example.

Re: [Rd] Rd: pdf manual: package information not on first page

On 25/06/2009 1:12 PM, Thorn Thaler wrote: Hi everybody, currently I'm working on two packages, where I've included a -package.Rd documentation file (with \docType set to "package") in each case. When I run "R CMD check" everything works fine, and a call to "R CMD install" generates the appro

Re: [Rd] check stats fail | part III

Well, tried using 4.2.0 instead - no luck. Regardless of which ACML I use, I'm getting the errors described in the original post. So, its not an ACML error (directly), but something has changed in the migration from Fedora Core 8 -> CentOS which isn't playing nice with ACML. Of course, figuring

[Rd] R data inspection under gdb?

Hi, everyone. I'm trying to debug an R-module, written in C, and I'm using gdb for this. How can I print "standard" R objects from within C code? BTW, I'm familiar with the advice to use R_PV given in Writing R Extensions, but it's not working for me. E.g., I get (gdb) p R_PV(x) $1 = void and

Re: [Rd] R data inspection under gdb?

Hi Kynn -- (gdb) call Rf_PrintValue(x) 'void' is I think the return value of R_PV() Martin Kynn Jones wrote: > Hi, everyone. I'm trying to debug an R-module, written in C, and I'm using > gdb for this. > > How can I print "standard" R objects from within C code? > > BTW, I'm familiar with th

[Rd] check stats fail | part III

For grins, tried rebuilding R 2.9.0 without using ACML 4.3.0. Config goes fine, make runs without any errors. make check - and - ta-dah! - no errors for stats. Everything seems to check out just fine. So, it seems as if R 2.9.0, ACML 4.3.0, and perhaps one/more things under CentOS don't play

[Rd] more on make check states failure

Ran make check-devel and make check-all (for more comprehensive testing) - same error messages - not even sure where to look in tests or Examples for 'help' - no logs, or files with .fail extension or anything I might *guess* to look for. I've never had this problem before - the only thing di

[Rd] failed stats check | R 2.9.0

Trying to get R 2.90 compiled on a CentOS 5.3 (i.e., RHEL 5.3) box, 64-bit. Machine has Opteron chips, so downloaded and installed ACML 4.3.0. Configured R with ./configure --with-lapack="-L/usr/lib64" --with-blas="-L/opt/acml4.2.0/gfortran64/lib -lacml" --with-tcltk Absolutely no problems/e

[Rd] Rd: pdf manual: package information not on first page

Hi everybody, currently I'm working on two packages, where I've included a -package.Rd documentation file (with \docType set to "package") in each case. When I run "R CMD check" everything works fine, and a call to "R CMD install" generates the appropriate html, text and pdf documentation.

[Rd] ignoring SIGPIPE signal + error loading lapack routines

Dear list I don't know whether this is the right place to post this message. If not, please redirect me to the proper place. i have a Perl application on Linux that uses R (V2.9.0) through the Perl-R interface. basically, the application performs statistical analysis using R, and displays the R o

Re: [Rd] read.csv

I am sorry for not including the attachment mentioned in my previous email. Attached now. Petr. --- R-devel/src/library/utils/R/readtable.R 2009-05-18 17:53:08.0 +0200 +++ R-devel-readtable/src/library/utils/R/readtable.R 2009-06-25 10:20:06.0 +0200 @@ -143,9 +143,6 @@

Re: [Rd] read.csv

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 02:56:01PM -0400, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > If read.csv's colClasses= argument is NOT used then read.csv accepts > double quoted numerics: > > 1: > read.csv(stdin()) > 0: A,B > 1: "1",1 > 2: "2",2 > 3: > A B > 1 1 1 > 2 2 2 > > However, if colClasses is used then it se

Re: [Rd] compile and install R @ one user defined directory? (PR#13779)

x...@epsilon.com wrote: > Dear Helper, > > Under UNIX "Solaris 10 3/05 s10_74L2a SPARC" and with following "R Installa= > tion and Administration" @ http://cran.r-project.org/, > > First, I unzipped the unix version winzip source code R-2.9.0.tar.gz using= > following commands at my own dir: >

[Rd] compile and install R @ one user defined directory? (PR#13779)

Dear Helper, Under UNIX "Solaris 10 3/05 s10_74L2a SPARC" and with following "R Installa= tion and Administration" @ http://cran.r-project.org/, First, I unzipped the unix version winzip source code R-2.9.0.tar.gz using= following commands at my own dir: /home/xwu/R1>gzip -dc R-