I don't know where you get your claims from. R graphics is handled
internally in inches, with a device-specific mapping to pixels/points
etc (which is documented for each device on its help page). This has
to be done carefully, as pixels may not be square.
What the meaning of pch=1:23 is in
Full_Name: David Kesling
Version: 2.9.0
OS: Windows Vista & XP sp2
Submission from: (NULL) (65.166.169.237)
I upgraded to 2.9.0 on my desktop (XP) and my laptop (Vista Home Basic). The XP
machine (with both Tinn-R and JGR) is running just fine... very happy. The
laptop is NOT doing too well. I've
Dear all,
Having received no answer in r-help I'm trying r-devel (hoping this is
not a stupid question).
I don't understand the rationale behind the absolute sizes of the point
symbols, and I couldn't find it documented (I got lost in the C code
graphics.c and gave up). The example below u
Simon Urbanek wrote:
On May 25, 2009, at 4:54 PM, Romain Francois wrote:
Simon Urbanek wrote:
[snip]
I need to read more about embedding R (as in section 8 of WRE). I
know you can supply your own implementation of the REPL, but I am
not sure this includes the one that goes on once trapp
On May 25, 2009, at 4:54 PM, Romain Francois wrote:
Simon Urbanek wrote:
[snip]
I need to read more about embedding R (as in section 8 of WRE). I
know you can supply your own implementation of the REPL, but I am
not sure this includes the one that goes on once trapped into the
browser
Hi Barry,
this is just a side-remark, probably not at all something you
were interested in, but to be put along this thread in the list
archives, in case some readers are side-tracked there ...
> "BaRow" == Barry Rowlingson
> on Fri, 22 May 2009 17:28:42 +0100 writes:
BaRow> I'v
Simon Urbanek wrote:
[snip]
I need to read more about embedding R (as in section 8 of WRE). I
know you can supply your own implementation of the REPL, but I am not
sure this includes the one that goes on once trapped into the browser.
Yes - it would be quite useless otherwise ;) there are
On Sun, 17 May 2009, goodr...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
Full_Name: Ben Goodrich
Version: 2.9.0
OS: Linux (Debian unstable)
Submission from: (NULL) (128.103.220.16)
row(x), col(x), and functions that call them like lower.tri(x) and
upper.tri(x) do not retain the rownames or colnames of x in the
> "PS" == Petr Savicky
> on Sat, 23 May 2009 18:22:26 +0200 writes:
PS> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:10:11PM +0200, wolfgang.re...@gmail.com
wrote:
PS> ...
>> Strange behavior of qbinom:
>>
>> > qbinom(0.01, 5016279, 1e-07)
>> [1] 0
>> > qbinom(0.01, 501627
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:58:06PM +0800, Berwin A Turlach wrote:
> Well, the first statement is a remark on comparison in general while
> the second statement is specific to "comparison operators and generic
> methods". There are other ways of comparing objects; note:
>
> R> f1 <- factor(c("a",
On May 24, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Romain Francois wrote:
Robert Gentleman wrote:
Hi,
I stripped the cc's as I believe that all read this list.
Romain Francois wrote:
[moving this to r-devel]
Robert Gentleman wrote:
Hi,
Romain Francois wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 5/22/2009 10:59 AM,
G'day Petr,
On Mon, 25 May 2009 09:04:14 +0200
Petr Savicky wrote:
> The first formulation "Be careful to compare ... levels in the same
> order" may be just a warning against a potential problem if the
> levels have different order, however this is not clear.
Well, the first statement is a rem
In the almost current development version (2009-05-22 r48594) and also in
https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/base/man/factor.Rd
?factor contains (compare the formulations marked by ^^)
\section{Warning}{
The interpretation of a factor depends on both the codes and the
\code{"
13 matches
Mail list logo
