Re: [Rd] whish stars.Rd

2009-05-04 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 04/05/2009 6:40 PM, Jean lobry wrote: Dear Rdev, in R 2.9.0 the doc of function stars() does not state that it returns invisibly the location of atomic graphs. This is a valuable information as it may help to set a value for the key.loc parameter of this function. My whish is just that the "

[Rd] whish stars.Rd

2009-05-04 Thread Jean lobry
Dear Rdev, in R 2.9.0 the doc of function stars() does not state that it returns invisibly the location of atomic graphs. This is a valuable information as it may help to set a value for the key.loc parameter of this function. My whish is just that the "value" section in stars.Rd should be docum

Re: [Rd] suggestion for extending ?as.factor

2009-05-04 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Martin Maechler wrote: >> "PS" == Petr Savicky >> on Sun, 3 May 2009 22:32:04 +0200 writes: >> "PS" == Petr Savicky >> on Sun, 3 May 2009 22:32:04 +0200 writes: > > PS> In R-2.10.0, the development version, function as.factor() uses 17 > digit > PS> precision for

Re: [Rd] nlminb - Port library codes

2009-05-04 Thread Douglas Bates
You could always look in the SVN logs but I'll save you the trouble. I did the initial installation of the nlminb function. On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:52 PM, John C Nash wrote: > Having looked at documentation and codes, I'm still looking to find out who > did the installation of the Port librarie

Re: [Rd] suggestion for extending ?as.factor

2009-05-04 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Petr Savicky wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 05:39:52PM +0200, Martin Maechler wrote: > [snip] >> Let me quickly expand the tasks we have wanted to address, when >> I started changing factor() for R-devel. >> >> 1) R-core had unanimously decided that R 2.10.0 should not allow >>duplicated leve

Re: [Rd] suggestion for extending ?as.factor

2009-05-04 Thread Petr Savicky
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 05:39:52PM +0200, Martin Maechler wrote: [snip] > Let me quickly expand the tasks we have wanted to address, when > I started changing factor() for R-devel. > > 1) R-core had unanimously decided that R 2.10.0 should not allow >duplicated levels in factors anymore. > >

Re: [Rd] suggestion for extending ?as.factor

2009-05-04 Thread Martin Maechler
> "PD" == Peter Dalgaard > on Mon, 04 May 2009 15:34:09 +0200 writes: PD> Martin Maechler wrote: >>> "PS" == Petr Savicky >>> on Sun, 3 May 2009 22:32:04 +0200 writes: >>> "PS" == Petr Savicky >>> on Sun, 3 May 2009 22:32:04 +0200 writes: >>

[Rd] how to change nlme() contrast parametrization?

2009-05-04 Thread Fabio Mathias
How to set the nlme() function to return the answer without the intercept parametrization? #= library(nlme) Soybean[1:3, ] (fm1Soy.lis <- nlsList(weight ~ SSlogis(Time, Asym, xmid, scal),

[Rd] how to change nlme() contrast parametrization?

2009-05-04 Thread Fabio Mathias
How to set the nlme() function to return the answer without the intercept parametrization? #= library(nlme) Soybean[1:3, ] (fm1Soy.lis <- nlsList(weight ~ SSlogis(Time, Asym, xmid, scal),

Re: [Rd] suggestion for extending ?as.factor

2009-05-04 Thread Martin Maechler
> "PS" == Petr Savicky > on Sun, 3 May 2009 22:32:04 +0200 writes: > "PS" == Petr Savicky > on Sun, 3 May 2009 22:32:04 +0200 writes: PS> In R-2.10.0, the development version, function as.factor() uses 17 digit PS> precision for conversion of numeric values to cha