Re: [Rd] incorrect output and segfaults from sprintf with %*d (PR#13667)

2009-04-27 Thread Wacek Kusnierczyk
Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:45 AM, wrote: > >> Yes, the documentation will also have to be amended, but apart >> from that, would people see a big problem with the "8192" limit >> which now is suddenly of greater importance >> {{as I said all along; hence my question

Re: [Rd] incorrect output and segfaults from sprintf with %*d (PR#13667)

2009-04-27 Thread Waclaw . Marcin . Kusnierczyk
Martin Maechler wrote: > > vQ> sptinf('%q%s', 1) > > > vQ> still suggests that one uses %{f,e,g,a} for numerics, > vQ> while %s is pretty much valid, too. you see, in c > vQ> sprintf(buffer, "%s", 1) is destined to cause a > vQ> segfault, but in r it works -- so the error m

Re: [Rd] incorrect output and segfaults from sprintf with %*d (PR#13667)

2009-04-27 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:45 AM, wrote: > > Yes, the documentation will also have to be amended, but apart > from that, would people see a big problem with the "8192" limit > which now is suddenly of greater importance > {{as I said all along;  hence my question to Wacek (and the >  R-develers)  

Re: [Rd] incorrect output and segfaults from sprintf with %*d (PR#13667)

2009-04-27 Thread maechler
> "vQ" == Waclaw Marcin Kusnierczyk > on Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:40:27 +0200 (CEST) writes: vQ> Martin Maechler wrote: >> MM> well, it is basically (+ a few bytes ?) the same 8192 MM> limit that *is* documented. indeed, I was right with that..

Re: [Rd] small typo in "CHANGES IN R VERSION 2.9.0"

2009-04-27 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 27/04/2009 5:12 AM, Henrik Parn wrote: Hi! In the second sub-heading in this document... http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/CHANGES.R-2.9.0 ...INSTALLATION is misspelled (INSTALLATIOM).. Really no big deal, but anyway. Thanks, I'll fix it. Duncan Murdoch _

[Rd] small typo in "CHANGES IN R VERSION 2.9.0"

2009-04-27 Thread Henrik Parn
Hi! In the second sub-heading in this document... http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/CHANGES.R-2.9.0 ...INSTALLATION is misspelled (INSTALLATIOM).. Really no big deal, but anyway. Cheers, Henrik -- Henrik Pärn Centre for Conservation Biology Department of Biology Norwegian Unive

Re: [Rd] memory.limit returns error (PR#13678)

2009-04-27 Thread ligges
cyrix...@gmx.net wrote: > Full_Name: Hans > Version: 2.9.0 > OS: Windows > Submission from: (NULL) (91.38.207.23) > > > Hi, > using memory.limit(4095) in Windows returns an error > trunc(.Internal(memory.size(size))). > > In other R-Versions the funktion worked fine. Please read the FAQs ab

[Rd] Patch proposal for logspace_sub

2009-04-27 Thread Berwin A Turlach
G'day all, I am working on problems where I have to calculate the logarithm of a sum or difference from the logarithms of the individual terms; so the functions logspace_add and logspace_sub which are part of R's API come in handy. However, I noticed that logspace_sub can have problems if both ar

[Rd] memory.limit returns error (PR#13678)

2009-04-27 Thread cyrix333
Full_Name: Hans Version: 2.9.0 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (91.38.207.23) Hi, using memory.limit(4095) in Windows returns an error trunc(.Internal(memory.size(size))). In other R-Versions the funktion worked fine. Greetings __ R-devel@r-proj