On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Christophe Genolini wrote:
Hi the list,
unlist respect the all the atomic type except orderd (it change of ordered
into factor) :
### integer
class(unlist(list(1:5,1:3)))
#[1] "integer"
### numeric
class(unlist(list(1.2,3.5)))
#[1] "numeric"
### character
class(unlist(
Thanks both
> The other item that might have a relationship to this
> is the ability to a copy an object without evaluating it. This can't be
> done entirely in R but can be done in C code from R:
> http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e2/devel/07/09/.html
> For me, copying is even more importa
On 24/10/2008 6:53 PM, Dave Roberts wrote:
Colleagues,
I have a routine in package labdsv that calls a FORTRAN subroutine.
Recently, I was informed that it sometimes gives different results on a
PC and Mac, and that the PC version is clearly wrong. I tested it on
linux (because I don't have
Colleagues,
I have a routine in package labdsv that calls a FORTRAN subroutine.
Recently, I was informed that it sometimes gives different results on a
PC and Mac, and that the PC version is clearly wrong. I tested it on
linux (because I don't have a PC), and I get the same (incorrect)
behav
Hi the list,
unlist respect the all the atomic type except orderd (it change of
ordered into factor) :
### integer
class(unlist(list(1:5,1:3)))
#[1] "integer"
### numeric
class(unlist(list(1.2,3.5)))
#[1] "numeric"
### character
class(unlist(list("e","e")))
#[1] "character"
### factor
class
Thanks Deepayan !
It worked great !
You can take a look at my commented sloppy code below.
It's mostly copy and paste from clickFocus.
If you ever get a chance I suggest you divide clickFocus in in two
functions:
- trellis.clickFocus:
Would behave like the function you have now but would ca
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Luke Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is already sone desire to have a
> way of checking whether a binding contains a delayed evaluation, so
> maybe something like a function bindingStatus that returns one of
> "active", "missing", "delayed" or "evaluated"
Returning the internal R_MissingArg token was a bug. From the svn
logs it looks like I fixed this bug back in June (so has been in
R-devel for a while) along with fixing a bug in the way system.time
used to be defined. I no longer recall the details but suspect the
need to fix this arose in test