Re: [Rd] (PR#11281) Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed

2008-05-10 Thread ripley
You will see the current code is different, and your 'fix' is not needed nor applies in R-devel. You failed to provide an example to reproduce the alleged bug, but the issue does seem to be using lines beyond the documented line length. So it would have only affected people who did that An

Re: [Rd] Typo in man page for "packBits" (PR#11435)

2008-05-10 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 09/05/2008 4:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One occurence of 'packbits' should be 'packBits' (version information below): Index: src/library/base/man/rawConversion.Rd === --- src/library/base/man/rawConversion.Rd (revisi

[Rd] Typo in man page for "packBits" (PR#11435)

2008-05-10 Thread greg
One occurence of 'packbits' should be 'packBits' (version information below): Index: src/library/base/man/rawConversion.Rd === --- src/library/base/man/rawConversion.Rd (revision 55) +++ src/library/base/man/rawConversion.Rd

Re: [Rd] Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11438)

2008-05-10 Thread bugreports
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:38 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > OK, I am just sending it here too as it looks like r-devel@r-project.org > > is not the right place: > > > I think it was seen there too, just that noone got around to reply. In > R-bugs, there's a filing sy

Re: [Rd] Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11281)

2008-05-10 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:38 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > OK, I am just sending it here too as it looks like r-devel@r-project.org > > is not the right place: > > > I think it was seen there too, just that noone got around to reply. In > R-bugs, there's a filing sy