On 25/04/2008 2:47 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
>
>> For what it's worth, I use ?foo mostly to look up usage of functions
>> that I know I want to use, and find it perfect for that (one benefit
>> over help() is that completion works for ?). The only t
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Rob Hyndman wrote:
> Can we please have a ... argument in median() to make it possible to pass
> arguments to specific methods.
Not without a reasoned case -- see 'Writing R Extensions' as to why it is
a non-trivial change that affects all existing methods (and there are
so
Hola Ramon!
>> But that is possible (you malloc the memory for a local copy in the rist
>> call), and rpart does something like it.
>>
>
> Aha, thanks, I didn't know it was doable (or easy). I'll look at the
> rpart code. One further question, though, what is "the rist call"?
I think Brian mea
Can we please have a ... argument in median() to make it possible to pass
arguments to specific methods.
_
Rob J Hyndman
Professor of Statistics, Monash University
Editor-in-Chief, International Journal of Forecasting
http://www.robhyndman.info/
[[alternative
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
>
>
> > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 3:19 AM, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Dear All,
> > > >
> > > > In a
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 3:19 AM, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> In a package, I am using ".C" to call some C functions. In one case,
>>> the number of elements of the return vectors ar
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 3:19 AM, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > In a package, I am using ".C" to call some C functions. In one case,
> > the number of elements of the return vectors are not known in R before
> > the C call. (Two of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK, I am just sending it here too as it looks like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g
> is not the right place:
> =20
I think it was seen there too, just that noone got around to reply. In=20
R-bugs, there's a filing system so that it won't be completely forgotten.=
=2E.
However, your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK, I am just sending it here too as it looks like r-devel@r-project.org
> is not the right place:
>
I think it was seen there too, just that noone got around to reply. In
R-bugs, there's a filing system so that it won't be completely forgotten...
However, your mail
Quite a few packages have used this construct to launch a device, but it
has several flaws. It's not clear in most cases that a package really
needs to launch a new device (R will do so if needed), but 2.7.0 provides
a function dev.new() to do so. (If you really need this in a GPL-ed
package
10 matches
Mail list logo
