G'day Martin,
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:40:43 +0200
Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think most of us would expect prod(0:1000) to return 0, and ...
> ... it does.
>
> However, many of us also expect
> prod(x1, x2)to be equivalent to
> prod(c(x1,x2))
> the same as we can e
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Mathieu Ribatet wrote:
> I definitely do agree with you.
> Basically, I see two different ways to proceed:
>
>1. one could first check if there are any 0 in the vector and then
> return 0 without computing the product
That would fail for prod(0,Inf), which should re
Just to follow up on my previous email with some results about this that may be
helpful as a guide for others... this was on a Linux box, Intel processor, R
2.6.2.
Following Prof. Ripley's suggestion, we went the shared BLAS route and were
able to get this working using Goto BLAS.
The combinati
Peter Danenberg wrote:
>> They aren't "cannibalized", they are still there, where the source
>> ref says they are.
>>
>
> I was thinking along the lines of using parse() to unambiguously
> associate a comment block with a code object; sure, srcref() retains
> them: but that's no different than
Sorry. I should have looked at the sas.Rout. Indeed, the network file
cannot be read.
This seems to be the same problem that was happening a couple of versions
ago and had to do with our firewall not allowing certain connections. The
solution then was to use the --internet2 switch. The same th
That check needs a (large) file from the internet. Your symptoms would be
consistent with it being temporarily unavailable. I would have expected
you to look at sas.Rout to see what happened.
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> A strange thing happened. After installing the mos
A strange thing happened. After installing the most recent RC version of
2.7 (2008-04-20 r45403) I compiled it as usual with no errors. After
installing it I ran "make fullcheck". I got as far as testing recommended
packages and I got the following:
...
Testing package foreign ---
I received the following message when installing
a private package:
** preparing package for lazy loading
Loading required package: roiutils
Loading required package: fzrutils
Loading required package: pkc
** help
>>> Building/Updating help pages for package 'psflib'
Formats: text html latex examp
I definitely do agree with you.
Basically, I see two different ways to proceed:
1. one could first check if there are any 0 in the vector and then
return 0 without computing the product
2. or convert prod(x1, x2, x3) in prod(c(x1, x2, x3))
Both approaches are similar except for the pa
I think most of us would expect prod(0:1000) to return 0, and ...
... it does.
However, many of us also expect
prod(x1, x2)to be equivalent to
prod(c(x1,x2))
the same as we can expect that for min(), max(), sum() and such
members of the "Summary" group.
Consequently, prod(0, 1:1000
Dear, Forum members,
My student are creating some functions to implement the median polish
kriging (one of prediction method in geostatistic). She want to create some
dialog box (to input some data) and menu. For this she is using
winMenuAddItem and winDialogString commands in function. But WinDi
11 matches
Mail list logo
