> IIRC, because there were always cases where they were attached to
> the wrong expression, and we were more or less convinced, there was
> no to do it "right" in all cases.
Doxygen and Javadoc seem to have solved the problem of comment-object
association, implying that it's not generally intracta
> They aren't "cannibalized", they are still there, where the source
> ref says they are.
I was thinking along the lines of using parse() to unambiguously
associate a comment block with a code object; sure, srcref() retains
them: but that's no different than parsing a text file.
If I can't associ
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Duncan Temple Lang <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | Duncan,
> |
> | On 20 April 2008 at 05:44, Duncan Temple Lang wrote:
> | | ~ I've waited to see if there would be posts from othe
On 20/04/2008 5:00 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>> On 20/04/2008 1:21 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>>
On 20/04/2008 8:43 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> There does seem to be some general proble
Dear list,
I'm currently trying to write a new R package to model spatial extremes.
In particular, for a model fitting procedure, I'd like to use flexible
response surfaces (like linear models, splines, ...) for the parameters
of my model. Following this idea, I'd like to allow "a new
inte
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 20/04/2008 1:21 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>
>>> On 20/04/2008 8:43 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
There does seem to be some general problem associated with Sweave
and graphics when I try it
On 20/04/2008 1:21 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>> On 20/04/2008 8:43 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>> There does seem to be some general problem associated with Sweave
>>> and graphics when I try it on my Vista system with
>>> [1] "R version 2.7.0 R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| Duncan,
|
| On 20 April 2008 at 05:44, Duncan Temple Lang wrote:
| | ~ I've waited to see if there would be posts from others, but am
| | a little surprised to see only your two. It would seem people aren't
| | using SWIG
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 20/04/2008 8:43 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>> There does seem to be some general problem associated with Sweave
>> and graphics when I try it on my Vista system with
>> [1] "R version 2.7.0 RC (2008-04-17 r45367)"
There is no evidence whatsoever
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
> Dear Prof. Ripley,
>
> thank you very much for correcting the treatment of 'extra underscore' that
> in fact solved our problem with the Fortran interface on my Ubuntu 7.1
> x86/64, even with g77 3.4.6. I accidentally installed g77 instead of gfortr
Dear Prof. Ripley,
thank you very much for correcting the treatment of 'extra underscore'
that in fact solved our problem with the Fortran interface on my Ubuntu
7.1 x86/64, even with g77 3.4.6. I accidentally installed g77 instead
of gfortran (4.x), sorry for my limited knowledge about that.
Hi
> Genetic algorithms / evolutionary computing _are_ already available via CRAN,
> see eg rgenoud and DEoptim. Wrapping existing ones is also fairly easy; I am
> sometimes use PGAPack from R at work (using non-released code)
thanks for the pointers to the various packages, I'll check them
out.
On 20/04/2008 8:43 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> There does seem to be some general problem associated with Sweave
> and graphics when I try it on my Vista system with
> [1] "R version 2.7.0 RC (2008-04-17 r45367)"
>
> Using tradeCosts-article.Rnw from the tradeCosts package:
>
> setwd(path
On 20 April 2008 at 09:22, esmail bonakdarian wrote:
| I am trying to implement a simple Genetic Algorithm using some of the
| functions of R (such as lm). I am a total newbie with regard to R, but
| not programming or GAs.
Genetic algorithms / evolutionary computing _are_ already available via C
Hello all,
I am trying to implement a simple Genetic Algorithm using some of the
functions of R (such as lm). I am a total newbie with regard to R, but
not programming or GAs.
I thought I would have to do this in R but now it seems there are ways
to call R functions from Java after all. (C++ woul
>>
>> Thanks, for code-compilation problems we need that level of detail.
>>
>> Your problem appears to be that you are mixing gcc4 and g77 (not
>> recommended), and g77 does use extra underscores, I believe. I have
>>
>> /* Define if your Fortran compiler appends an extra_underscore to
>> exte
There does seem to be some general problem associated with Sweave
and graphics when I try it on my Vista system with
[1] "R version 2.7.0 RC (2008-04-17 r45367)"
Using tradeCosts-article.Rnw from the tradeCosts package:
setwd(path.to.tradeCosts-article.Rnw)
Sweave("tradeCosts-article.Rnw"
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Thibaut Jombart wrote:
>
>> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>
>>> And your machine is? -- you haven't given the 'at a minimum'
>>> information asked for in the posting guide.
>>>
>>> Neither example is reproducible on my Fedora 8 x86_64 systems (nor
>>> i
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Thibaut Jombart wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
And your machine is? -- you haven't given the 'at a minimum' information
asked for in the posting guide.
Neither example is reproducible on my Fedora 8 x86_64 systems (nor in the
case of tripack, on CRAN's). It will need
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> And your machine is? -- you haven't given the 'at a minimum'
> information asked for in the posting guide.
>
> Neither example is reproducible on my Fedora 8 x86_64 systems (nor in
> the case of tripack, on CRAN's). It will need someone with an
> affected system to d
And your machine is? -- you haven't given the 'at a minimum' information
asked for in the posting guide.
Neither example is reproducible on my Fedora 8 x86_64 systems (nor in the
case of tripack, on CRAN's). It will need someone with an affected system
to debug this. One possibility is that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Full_Name: Thomas Petzoldt
>Version: R 2.8.0 devel, svn version 45389
>OS: Linux x86/64 Ubuntu 7.1
>Submission from: (NULL) (217.235.62.12)
>
>
>In contrast to all other tested operating systems a call of Fortran functions
>on
>Linux x86/64 requires an appended underscor
> >> anyone object to bringing it back?
> >>
> DM> Yes, I would.
>
> and so would probably almost everyone in R-core.
> We *did* think already back in the last millennium...
> and removed them for a good reason
> {IIRC, because there were always cases where they were attached
> to
23 matches
Mail list logo
