Martin Morgan wrote:
> package.skeleton inserts a lowercase second l in LazyLoad, so that the
> package is not, in fact, lazy loaded.
>
> Martin
>
Fix committed.
--
O__ Peter Dalgaard Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cp
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Duncan,
>
> On 20 April 2008 at 05:44, Duncan Temple Lang wrote:
> | ~ I've waited to see if there would be posts from others, but am
> | a little surprised to see only your two. It would seem people aren't
> | usi
package.skeleton inserts a lowercase second l in LazyLoad, so that the
package is not, in fact, lazy loaded.
Martin
--
Martin Morgan
Computational Biology / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N.
PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109
Location: Arnold Building M2 B169
Phone: (206)
> "DM" == Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:46:32 -0400 writes:
DM> Peter Danenberg wrote:
>>> The source references achieve something similar.
>>>
> Thanks, Duncan; it seems like SkipComment cannibalizes
>> comments before they get t
Peter Danenberg wrote:
>> The source references achieve something similar.
>>
>
> Thanks, Duncan; it seems like SkipComment cannibalizes comments before
> they get to srcref, though.
>
> I had to go back as far as 1999, actually, to find a version of gram.y
> that implemented AddComment; would
Duncan,
On 20 April 2008 at 05:44, Duncan Temple Lang wrote:
| ~ I've waited to see if there would be posts from others, but am
| a little surprised to see only your two. It would seem people aren't
| using SWIG for R and I wonder why this community hasn't used or wanted
AFAICT it is a classic
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 05:44 +1200, Duncan Temple Lang wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi Michael and Soeren
>
> ~ I've waited to see if there would be posts from others, but am
> a little surprised to see only your two. It would seem people aren't
> using SWIG fo
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> As I recall, you use Debian so do
>
>$ sudo apt-get install r-cran-snow r-cran-rmpi
>
> to get R support working out-of-the box. Then study the examples for Snow on
> Luke's website. [ I also have some slides on my website from presentations I
>
> The source references achieve something similar.
Thanks, Duncan; it seems like SkipComment cannibalizes comments before
they get to srcref, though.
I had to go back as far as 1999, actually, to find a version of gram.y
that implemented AddComment; would anyone object to bringing it back?
_
Full_Name: Thomas Petzoldt
Version: R 2.8.0 devel, svn version 45389
OS: Linux x86/64 Ubuntu 7.1
Submission from: (NULL) (217.235.62.12)
In contrast to all other tested operating systems a call of Fortran functions on
Linux x86/64 requires an appended underscore.
The problem occured with package
Hi.
I also have looked for a SWIG-R module in the recent past.
However, since my use case was small enough, and given the
experimental state in which I found the current R module
implementation, I gave up, and coded the bindings manually.
By the way, a tool like SWIG is extremely useful, as tnx t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michael and Soeren
~ I've waited to see if there would be posts from others, but am
a little surprised to see only your two. It would seem people aren't
using SWIG for R and I wonder why this community hasn't used or wanted
such tools? Do we no
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Bill Dunlap wrote:
> I tried for the first time to build R from source on Windows, where I
> got the source code via svn. Per the Installation and Administration
> manual, I altered src\gnuwin32\MkRules so it had the the locally
> correct paths to HTML Help Workshop and Inno
As the posting guide asked you to do before posting, you need to update to
a current snapshot. There was a build for a few hours did that on the
second and subsequent downloads only, and yours is two weeks' old.
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> Sorry, forgot this:
>
>> R.versio
Sorry, forgot this:
> R.version.string # Vista
[1] "R version 2.7.0 alpha (2008-04-03 r45066)"
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Gabor Grothendieck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am updating some packages using the packages menu
> and noticed that the progress window says 100% in the
> title done
Dear Gabor,
> -Original Message-
> From: Gabor Grothendieck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: April-19-08 9:10 AM
> To: John Fox
> Cc: R-devel
> Subject: Re: [Rd] package building problem under Windows Vista
>
> Note that CRAN is also having a problem with the package
> so its not just yo
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Herve Pages wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The parser doesn't seem to like this:
>>
>> somePackage::foo(x) <- value
>> somePackage:::foo(x) <- value
>>
>> where foo() is a replacement function or method defined in package
>> somePacka
I am updating some packages using the packages menu
and noticed that the progress window says 100% in the
title done all the time. It works, its just that the progress
percentage is wrong.
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailm
Dear Brian,
Actually, though it's irrelevant, I did set the environment variables TEMP
and TMP (and of course forgot that R uses TMPDIR instead).
Unfortunately, setting TMPDIR to d:\temp doesn't solve the problem:
snip -
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6001]
Copyright (c
Note that CRAN is also having a problem with the package
so its not just you:
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/2.7/check/tm-check.log
I also have a problem with the vignettes (note
there are two) but as with you this works:
Rcmd build --no-vignettes tradeCosts
I don't have any spec
John,
The environment variables are case-sensitive (not temp and tmp), and
TMPDIR is the one used by 'R CMD build'. I think you need to set TMPDIR to
somewhere known to have full control. Why that is not true of
C:/Users/JOHNFO~1/AppData/Local/Temp is unclear to me, but I don't think
anything
Dear list members,
I've encountered the following problem trying to build a package under
Windows Vista (SP1). The problem occurs with both R 2.6.2 and R 2.7.0 RC
(from which this output was produced). The package builds just fine on my XP
(SP2) machine. Please see some further comments below.
--
On 19/04/2008 1:09 AM, Peter Danenberg wrote:
> AddComment in gram.y would have been an extremely useful feature, but
> it's been #if-0'd out; is it unimplemented?
It was removed in 2001.
>
> It should have attached a comment attribute to any SEXP associated
> with a comment.
>
The source refer
23 matches
Mail list logo
