On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Georgios Marentakis wrote:
> thanks for all the responses,
> just to mention that I have also experimented with quite a few versions of
> the compiler and there was always a failure at a different test, filing a
> bug report is a good idea. Does the 64 version work as expecte
thanks for all the responses,
just to mention that I have also experimented with quite a few versions of
the compiler and there was always a failure at a different test, filing a
bug report is a good idea. Does the 64 version work as expected in Linux?
thanks,
georgios
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
--27464147-424409593-1206629856=:11528
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
OK, so it is Wi
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
--27464147-934395014-1206614168=:3302
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Yes, thanks but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Richard Reed
> Version: 2.6.2
> OS: MS Windows XP Pro
> Submission from: (NULL) (76.121.170.35)
>
>
> Pressing Alt-M+s doesn't search path. It just generates another ">". It does
> this in "vanilla" too. However, Alt-M+click "list search path" does work. Note
>
