Re: [Rd] Problem building R with Intel MKL v10 BLAS

2008-02-04 Thread M Redmond
Michael Braun MIT.EDU> writes: > > NO > > Hi. I'm not sure if this is an R-help or R-devel problem, so I'm > starting here in the hope that someone can help (and willing to go to > the other list if it's more appropriate). I think I am following all of > the instructions in the various man

Re: [Rd] Problem building R with Intel MKL v10 BLAS

2008-02-04 Thread M Redmond
Ei-ji Nakama ki.rim.or.jp> writes: > > Hi. > > 2008/1/25, Michael Braun mit.edu>: > > NO > > > > Hi. I'm not sure if this is an R-help or R-devel problem, so I'm > > starting here in the hope that someone can help (and willing to go to > > the other list if it's more appropriate). I think I

Re: [Rd] R valgrind question

2008-02-04 Thread Jeffrey Horner
Daniel Oberski wrote on 02/04/2008 02:21 PM: > Dear R developers > > > I am running an instrumented build of R 2.6.1 on ubuntu, compiled with > option configure --with-valgrind-instrumentation=3. > > If run valgrind R then I get all sorts of warnings. I was wondering > whether I should worry abo

Re: [Rd] R valgrind question

2008-02-04 Thread Daniel Oberski
Sorry I forgot to mention this happens just starting and then stopping R. I am not running any other commands or loading any packages. > I was trying to check my own C program (as a standalone program it > does not produce any valgrind warnings), but now I am not sure what is > going on when usin

[Rd] R valgrind question

2008-02-04 Thread Daniel Oberski
Dear R developers I am running an instrumented build of R 2.6.1 on ubuntu, compiled with option configure --with-valgrind-instrumentation=3. If run valgrind R then I get all sorts of warnings. I was wondering whether I should worry about them or not. First, when I open R as follows: $R -d "v

Re: [Rd] (PR#10696) maybe a bug in the system.time() function?

2008-02-04 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
You will get yelled at by others for posting a question as a bug... (sigh). See FAQ. That said, your understanding of the output of system.time() is wrong. The value you are after is simply user+system. %CPU is essentially user+system/elapsed. It is elapsed which is dependent on system load, not

Re: [Rd] r-release Windows x86_64

2008-02-04 Thread Uwe Ligges
Paul Gilbert wrote: > I was just looking at the daily checks and it seems the "r-release > Windows x86_64 (32-bit)" column is running R2.6.0. Is that correct? Paul, well, currently it is not checking daily, but new checks are done in R-2.6.2 RC. I'll rerun all check today and tomorrow and w

[Rd] r-release Windows x86_64

2008-02-04 Thread Paul Gilbert
I was just looking at the daily checks and it seems the "r-release Windows x86_64 (32-bit)" column is running R2.6.0. Is that correct? Possibly related, an error is being flagged in that column for TSMySQL, which appears to be a problem that should be caught in the other columns too. It is

Re: [Rd] a != a*1 != a+0 != +a

2008-02-04 Thread hadley wickham
> One issue is the behaviour of unary operators "+" and "-". > > If trim is TRUE, then "a" is one thing, but "+a" returns > "trim(a)", which might be different. > > Also "1*a" would be different from "a" and "a+0" I think this is ok. In the ggplot2 package I use + to join together multiple p

[Rd] maybe a bug in the system.time() function? (PR#10696)

2008-02-04 Thread iacob
Full_Name: Alessandra Iacobucci Version: 2.5.1 OS: Mac OS X 10.4.11 Submission from: (NULL) (193.48.71.92) Hi, I am making some intensive simulations for the testing of a Population Monte Carlo algorithm. This involves also a study of the CPU times in two different case. What I am trying to measu

Re: [Rd] strftime fails on POSIXct objects (PR#10695)

2008-02-04 Thread Donald Allen
On Feb 4, 2008 9:49 AM, Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > R 2.6.1 on a Thinkpad T60 running up-to-date Gentoo: > > > > Despite the documentation, which says: > > > > 'strftime' is an alias for 'format.POSIXlt', and 'format.POSIXct' > > first converts

Re: [Rd] a != a*1 != a+0 != +a

2008-02-04 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
I don't think global options are desirable. I would make your operators work in a single way and if the user wants a different way he can call whatever functions you provide directly instead of using the operators. If you really need two ways with operators I would define a subclass with operator

Re: [Rd] strftime fails on POSIXct objects (PR#10695)

2008-02-04 Thread Peter Dalgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > R 2.6.1 on a Thinkpad T60 running up-to-date Gentoo: > > Despite the documentation, which says: > > 'strftime' is an alias for 'format.POSIXlt', and 'format.POSIXct' > first converts to class '"POSIXlt"' by calling 'as.POSIXlt'. Note > that only that conve

[Rd] strftime fails on POSIXct objects (PR#10695)

2008-02-04 Thread donaldcallen
R 2.6.1 on a Thinkpad T60 running up-to-date Gentoo: Despite the documentation, which says: 'strftime' is an alias for 'format.POSIXlt', and 'format.POSIXct' first converts to class '"POSIXlt"' by calling 'as.POSIXlt'. Note that only that conversion depends on the time zone. strf

[Rd] Error in La.svd(x, nu, nv) : error code 1 from Lapack routine 'dgesdd' (PR#10694)

2008-02-04 Thread ari
Full_Name: A Ho-Foster Version: R 2.6.1 OS: Win XP Home Submission from: (NULL) (168.167.180.199) Hi I am using a package called Amelia, and it gives this error while it is performing bootstrapping: Error in La.svd(x, nu, nv) : error code 1 from Lapack routine 'dgesdd' I have consulted

[Rd] a != a*1 != a+0 != +a

2008-02-04 Thread Robin Hankin
hits=1.0 tests=MANY_EXCLAMATIONS X-USF-Spam-Flag: NO Hi I am writing a package for multivariate polynomials ('multipols') using S3 methods. The package includes a Ops.multipol() function for the arithmetic methods; I would like to define some sort of user-specified Boolean option which, if set

Re: [Rd] gdb

2008-02-04 Thread Martin Maechler
> "DE" == Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:22:30 -0600 writes: DE> On 4 February 2008 at 01:51, Joe Bloggs wrote: DE> | Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DE> | DE> | > On 3 February 2008 at 01:08, Joe Bloggs wrote: DE> | > |

Re: [Rd] gdb

2008-02-04 Thread Joe Bloggs
>Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On 4 February 2008 at 01:51, Joe Bloggs wrote: > | Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > | > On 3 February 2008 at 01:08, Joe Bloggs wrote: > | > | I am using gdb to debug a c++ library I made for R using Rcpp. > | > | However, when