On 17 December 2007 at 18:03, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
| Douglas Bates wrote:
| > There was recently a question on the R-help list about the eee pc. I
| > had a related question about the XO laptop from OLPC (laptop.org).
| > Has anyone looked at the development environment sufficiently to
| > deter
Jeffrey J. Hallman wrote:
> Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> One reason I don't want to work on this is because the appropriate
>> action depends on what "length(x)" is intended to mean. Currently for
>> POSIXlt objects, it gives the physical length of the underlying basic
>
Douglas Bates wrote:
> There was recently a question on the R-help list about the eee pc. I
> had a related question about the XO laptop from OLPC (laptop.org).
> Has anyone looked at the development environment sufficiently to
> determine if it would be possible to create an executable image for
There was recently a question on the R-help list about the eee pc. I
had a related question about the XO laptop from OLPC (laptop.org).
Has anyone looked at the development environment sufficiently to
determine if it would be possible to create an executable image for R?
The laptop itself only su
RGtk2 is a packages that is a wrapper for GTK+ GUI toolkit. GTK+ itself
is a large separate software package. I do not know if GTK+ is delivered
within the RGtk2, but I doubt it as the former is quite big (at least
with my own package that uses GTK, users need to install GTK
separately). Now on Win
Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One reason I don't want to work on this is because the appropriate
> action depends on what "length(x)" is intended to mean. Currently for
> POSIXlt objects, it gives the physical length of the underlying basic
> type (the list). This is the same b
This is not a bug, and not appropriate to R-bugs as it is about a
contributed package.
>From http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/2.6/ReadMe you will see
Package RGtk2 requires an installed version of Gtk2 with version
number >= 2.10.11.
Now, so does GGobi and hence rggobi. 'Ins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Caroline Keef
> Version: 2.6.1
> OS: Windows XP
> Submission from: (NULL) (195.171.203.131)
>
>
> I have tried to install the package rggobi which if I'm right requires the
> package RGtk2
> If I install RGtk2 using the install.packages (I used the UK (Bristol
This isn't an R bug. You should send contributed package problems to
the package maintainer, in this case Michael Lawrence.
You need to install GTK; it's not included as part of the package. See
this page for instructions:
http://www.ggobi.org/rgtk2/
It would probably be a good idea for the
On 12/17/2007 9:06 AM, Oleg Sklyar wrote:
> Dear Patrick,
>
> Firstly, and most importantly, I do not think that your post qualified
> for Rd! Please use the correct mail list for such things: R-help. I do
> not think anybody on Rd wants mailboxes clogged with irrelevant
> messages.
Since Patri
Patches to the help files sound like a good idea. However,
it isn't something I'm likely to get to immediately. I'm
hoping that some other nice person will volunteer.
Pat
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 12/17/2007 6:00 AM, Patrick Burns wrote:
>
>> I recently had a discussion with a user about load
Full_Name: Caroline Keef
Version: 2.6.1
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (195.171.203.131)
I have tried to install the package rggobi which if I'm right requires the
package RGtk2
If I install RGtk2 using the install.packages (I used the UK (Bristol) mirror, I
haven't tried any other mirro
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 14:06 +, Oleg Sklyar wrote:
> Dear Patrick,
>
> Firstly, and most importantly, I do not think that your post qualified
> for Rd! Please use the correct mail list for such things: R-help. I do
> not think anybody on Rd wants mailboxes clogged with irrelevant
> messages.
Dear Patrick,
Firstly, and most importantly, I do not think that your post qualified
for Rd! Please use the correct mail list for such things: R-help. I do
not think anybody on Rd wants mailboxes clogged with irrelevant
messages.
Back to your question: it is not clear if you are confused, or yo
On 12/17/2007 6:00 AM, Patrick Burns wrote:
> I recently had a discussion with a user about loading
> and attaching in R. I was surprised that the help files
> don't provide a very clear picture.
>
> From my point of view 'load' and 'attach' are very
> similar operations, the difference being t
I recently had a discussion with a user about loading
and attaching in R. I was surprised that the help files
don't provide a very clear picture.
From my point of view 'load' and 'attach' are very
similar operations, the difference being that 'attach'
creates a new database on the search list w
Basically, I used the without intercept to get an estimate for each of my
factor levels instead of using a reference class. So I use a kind of hidden
intercept.
I should have noticed that the behavior was documented in ?summary.lm.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Lieven
Duncan Murdoch-2 wrote:
17 matches
Mail list logo
