Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 01/12/2007 2:38 PM, Michael Hoffman wrote:
>> Dieter Menne wrote:
>>> Michael Hoffman sneakemail.com> writes:
>>>
I would like to be able to do something like this:
<>=
...
@
with mywidth set in a previous code chunk. Is there
On Dec 1, 2007 3:56 PM, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My understanding is that Michael wants to have the Sweave options in a
> chunk depend on a calculation happening in the underlying R session.
> This is hard to do with hooks, because they are run after the options
> have already b
I've moved this response to R-devel, because my contribution is more
along those lines. Michael, if this doesn't interest you, please let us
know.
On 01/12/2007 2:38 PM, Michael Hoffman wrote:
> Dieter Menne wrote:
>> Michael Hoffman sneakemail.com> writes:
>>
>>> I would like to be able to do
strange - but at least the strangeness resolved itself. If the problem
was with your code as opposed to your build environment, I guess you'll
soon here from a CRAN maintainer about it (and by the way: CRAN incoming
does not allow read permission for others, so if you upload there it's
not really
What is the bug here? You haven't told us what you think it is, and
> 110231L * 101347L
[1] NA
Warning message:
In 110231L * 101347L : NAs produced by integer overflow
is both intentional and documented: see ?Arithmetic.
Please do give a reproducible example (as we ask): yours is not as we
hav
>From the help for data.frame() (sic):
Objects passed to 'data.frame' should have the same number of
rows, but atomic vectors, factors and character vectors protected
by 'I' will be recycled a whole number of times if necessary.
so this is the documented behaviour.
Perhaps you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Stefan Th. Gries
> Version: R version 2.6.1 (2007-11-26)
> OS: Windows XP Home SP2
> Submission from: (NULL) (68.6.47.105)
>
>
> Hi
>
> A simple computation results in integer overflow:
>
> These are the relevant vectors:
>
>
>> sum(cur.obs)
>>
> [1] 11
Dear Jelle,
Could you put the package somewhere public? This would make it easier to
diagnose the problem.
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear R developers,
>
> When building/checking my package (in R 2.6.1 under windows) I run into
> some messages that I do not completely unde
Full_Name: Stefan Th. Gries
Version: R version 2.6.1 (2007-11-26)
OS: Windows XP Home SP2
Submission from: (NULL) (68.6.47.105)
Hi
A simple computation results in integer overflow:
These are the relevant vectors:
> sum(cur.obs)
[1] 110231
> colfreq
otherpast perfect pres
Full_Name: Adrian Dragulescu
Version: 2.6.0
OS: Windows
Submission from: (NULL) (216.99.178.65)
> data.frame(x=1:10, y="A") # expands fine
x y
1 1 A
2 2 A
3 3 A
4 4 A
5 5 A
6 6 A
7 7 A
8 8 A
9 9 A
10 10 A
>
> data.frame(x=1:10, z=as.Date("2007-01-01")) # get an error
Full_Name: Jeffrey Racine
Version: 2.6.1 and previous...
OS: FreeBSD
Submission from: (NULL) (130.113.139.86)
Hi.
I almost feel bad reporting this, but here goes.
The summary() for lm() (and possibly others?) uses a capitalized `S' in Multiple
R-Squared but a lowercase `s' in Adjusted R-squared
Dear R developers,
When building/checking my package (in R 2.6.1 under windows) I run into
some messages that I do not completely understand and that do not give
me precise enough leads to pinpoint where the error in my package is. I
would be very grateful for any suggestions. Did anyone else enc
12 matches
Mail list logo
