"big"
>
> $pkgType
> [1] "source"
>
> $path.sep
> [1] ":"
>
> $r_arch
> [1] ""
>
>>
>
> I built 64-bit R on Mac OS X 10.4.10 with these commands:
>
> export
> PATH='/usr/local/lib64/X11/bin:/
+ -arch ppc64' \
'FC=gfortran-4.0 -arch ppc64' 'F77=gfortran-4.0 -arch ppc64' \
'CFLAGS=-g -O3 -mtune=G5 -mcpu=G5' 'FFLAGS=-g -O3 -mtune=G5 -mcpu=G5' \
'LDFLAGS=-arch ppc64 -m64 -L/usr/local/lib' 'CXXFLAGS=-g -O3 -mtune=G5
-mcpu=G5' \
'FCFLAGS=-g -O3 -mtune=G5 -mcpu=G5' --disable-R-framework --enable-R-shlib \
'--with-blas=-framework vecLib' --with-lapack 1>
configure.R.ppc64.out.20071107.Run01.txt 2>&1
sudo make 1> make.R.ppc64.out.20071107.Run01.txt 2>&1
sudo make check 1> make.check.R.ppc64.out.20071107.Run01.txt 2>&1
Steve McKinney
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 08:15:17AM +0100, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Andrew Robinson wrote:
> >These are important concerns. It seems to me that adding an argument
> >as suggested by Bill will allow the user to side-step the problem
> >identified by Brian.
> >
> >Bill, under what kinds of circumstanc
There is a simple solution to this kind of problem - for my
non-day-job-related software stuff, I usually subscribe under
my sourceforge address. Sourceforge's is simple re-direction service
so I actually cannot post from it; but I like incoming e-mails to go
through sourceforge for a double spam f
Dear Martin, Jari, et al.,
Another relevant point (which I haven't seen in this discussion -- perhaps I
missed it) is that one can read the CHANGES and NEWS files on CRAN without
downloading or installing R-patched.
Regards,
John
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailt
> "JO" == Jari Oksanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Wed, 07 Nov 2007 12:21:10 +0200 writes:
JO> On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 10:51 +0100, Simone Giannerini wrote:
>> [snip] (this is from pd = Peter Dalgaard)
>> > Maybe, but given the way things have been working lately, it might be
Hi Jari,
(and interested readers)
> "JO" == Jari Oksanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Wed, 07 Nov 2007 12:21:10 +0200 writes:
[..]
[...some very good stuff...]
[..]
JO> Cheers, Jari Oksanen
JO> PS. Please Mr Moderator, don't
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Don MacQueen wrote:
> Of course. It was built for Solaris 2.7.
> (I did look at R-admin, but not carefully and thoroughly enough.)
Good to know (and I didn't expect you to know it was in the manual, was
just pointing out where to look for further help).
>
> Thank you.
> -Don
On Nov 7, 2007, at 5:21 AM, Jari Oksanen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 10:51 +0100, Simone Giannerini wrote:
>> [snip] (this is from pd = Peter Dalgaard)
>>> Maybe, but given the way things have been working lately, it might
>>> be
>>> better to emphasize
>>>
>>> (a) check the mailinglists
>
Of course. It was built for Solaris 2.7.
(I did look at R-admin, but not carefully and thoroughly enough.)
Thank you.
-Don
At 7:33 AM + 11/6/07, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>What OS was that compiler built for? This happened when you had a
>version of gcc built for the wrong version of the OS,
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 10:51 +0100, Simone Giannerini wrote:
> [snip] (this is from pd = Peter Dalgaard)
> > Maybe, but given the way things have been working lately, it might be
> > better to emphasize
> >
> > (a) check the mailinglists
> > (b) try R-patched
> > (c) if in doubt, ask, rather than r
Hello Prof Brian Ripley and list
There is no "d-p-q-r-tests.Rout" file, the following files do exists
and are being sent as attachments:
./tests/d-p-q-r-tests.R , ./tests/d-p-q-r-tests.Rout.save , ./tests/d-
p-q-r-tests.Rout.fail .
Cheers,
Kamil
Kamil Marcinkowski W
On 6/11/2007, at 10:35 PM, Ken Beath wrote:
> On 06/11/2007, at 8:59 AM, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm not sure if this is the right target to which to direct this
>> post,
>> but I couldn't think of anything more appropriate.
>>
>
> R-Sig-Mac https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac is
Jari Oksanen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 10:51 +0100, Simone Giannerini wrote:
>
>> [snip] (this is from pd = Peter Dalgaard)
>>
>>> Maybe, but given the way things have been working lately, it might be
>>> better to emphasize
>>>
>>> (a) check the mailinglists
>>> (b) try R-patched
>>>
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Simone Giannerini wrote:
[snip]
Maybe, but given the way things have been working lately, it might be
better to emphasize
(a) check the mailinglists
(b) try R-patched
(c) if in doubt, ask, rather than report as bug
(Ideally, people would try the prerelease versions and pro
[snip]
> Maybe, but given the way things have been working lately, it might be
> better to emphasize
>
> (a) check the mailinglists
> (b) try R-patched
> (c) if in doubt, ask, rather than report as bug
>
> (Ideally, people would try the prerelease versions and problems like
> this would be caught b
16 matches
Mail list logo
