Hi all, I'm having a problem with some sort of interaction with try()
and methods, I think.
The setup is as follows, I have an S4 class that holds an environment
and I would like to evaluate the right hand side of a function inside
that environment. No problem there.
However, if the formula invol
On 16/08/2007, at 10:55 AM, Edo Airoldi wrote:
> installed from the binary image (http://cran.r-project.org/bin/
> macosx/) on an intel mac 10.4.10 throws three warnings:
>
> -
> R version 2.5.1 (2007-06-27)
> Copyright (C) 2007 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
> ISBN 3-9
installed from the binary image (http://cran.r-project.org/bin/
macosx/) on an intel mac 10.4.10 throws three warnings:
-
R version 2.5.1 (2007-06-27)
Copyright (C) 2007 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
ISBN 3-900051-07-0
R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO
Zhenhuan Cui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I created an add-on R package. In this package, there is a line
> "require(pckgname)", because I need to call some functions in pckgname. My
> package is successfully built and can be successful installed. But R CMD
> check can not be executed. The err
I created an add-on R package. In this package, there is a line
"require(pckgname)", because I need to call some functions in pckgname. My
package is successfully built and can be successful installed. But R CMD
check can not be executed. The error message is:
* checking package dependencies ..
Ben Bolker wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Ben Bolker wrote:
>>>
Petr Savicky cs.cas.cz> writes:
> Could you also include a script, which reproduces the problem? Just
> to see under
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
>
>> Ben Bolker wrote:
>>> Petr Savicky cs.cas.cz> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Could you also include a script, which reproduces the problem? Just
to see under which conditions the problem occurs and how it
looks like exa
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Ben Bolker wrote:
>> Petr Savicky cs.cas.cz> writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Could you also include a script, which reproduces the problem? Just
>>> to see under which conditions the problem occurs and how it
>>> looks like exactly.
>>>
>>> Petr Savicky.
>>>
>>>
Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> Thanks to both of you! /Henrik
>
> On 8/15/07, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 8/14/2007 2:52 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>
>>> The MinGW people have finally released a couple of builds of gcc 4.2.1
>>>
Seconded. In particular, can we hav
Thanks to both of you! /Henrik
On 8/15/07, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/14/2007 2:52 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> > The MinGW people have finally released a couple of builds of gcc 4.2.1
> > (and finally moved the build of 3.4.5 to release status after 19 months as
> > 'candi
On 8/14/2007 2:52 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> The MinGW people have finally released a couple of builds of gcc 4.2.1
> (and finally moved the build of 3.4.5 to release status after 19 months as
> 'candidate').
>
> We intend to use gcc 4.2.1 for the binary distribution of R 2.6.0, and
> build
Tobias Verbeke wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
>> Tobias Verbeke businessdecision.com> writes:
>>
>>> The resulting package now allows for using an embedded OpenBUGS
>>> on GNU/Linux without relying on WINE. Thanks to all for their helpful
>>> comments.
>>
>> woo-hoo! this is great! Any chance that thi
12 matches
Mail list logo
