On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Spencer Graves wrote:
> Hi, All:
> Attached please find a symmetric, indefinite matrix for which
> 'eigen(...)$vectors' included NAs:
>> load("eigenBug.Rdata")
>> sum(is.na(eigen(eigenBug)$vectors))
> [1] 5670
>> sessioninfo()
> Error: could not find function "sessioninf
Hi, All:
Attached please find a symmetric, indefinite matrix for which
'eigen(...)$vectors' included NAs:
> load("eigenBug.Rdata")
> sum(is.na(eigen(eigenBug)$vectors))
[1] 5670
> sessioninfo()
Error: could not find function "sessioninfo"
> sessionInfo()
R version 2.4.1 (2006-12-18)
i386
> "GS" == Gavin Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Sat, 17 Mar 2007 13:02:29 + writes:
GS> Dear List
GS> Having not received any comments for or against my proposal to make
GS> screeplot() a generic function, I found some time to make the relevant
GS> changes to the s
Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have just committed my variation of Seth's patch, so please check the
> current r-devel too.
Thanks, Peter. And I agree that your variation is cleaner.
--
Seth Falcon | Computational Biology | Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
http://biocondu
Dear List
Having not received any comments for or against my proposal to make
screeplot() a generic function, I found some time to make the relevant
changes to the svn trunk repository (revision 40848).
Please find attached a patch against the R svn trunk sources including
changes to the relevant
There is nothing in the R definition of a package to indicate if it is
architecture-specific or not. Further, one version of a package might be,
but an updated version might not (as has just happened with 'ifa').
Thus there are currently no 'noarch' R packages.
[For those who miss the subtleti
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it ok to have more than one period in a package name, e.g.
> aroma.light.bioc?
>
> I remember there was once a limitation/a recommendation that one
> should use at most one period in a package name. I just browsed
> "Writing R Extensions"
Matthias Burger wrote:
> Hi Seth,
>
> I applied your patch and the issues seems to be resolved. Now I just wait
> to see if all test case failures related to this disappear.
>
> Thank you for your kind help!
>
> Matthias
>
I have just committed my variation of Seth's patch, so please
Hi Seth,
>It isn't S4 specific. The issue seems more about anonymous
>calls/functions.
>
> ll = list()
> ll[[1]] = function(x) stop("died")
>
> v = try(do.call(ll[[1]], list(1)), silent=TRUE)
> Error in as.list(call)[[1]] == "doTryCatch" :
> comparison (1) is possible only for atom
