On 3/8/07, Luke Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Paul Murrell wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > Luke Tierney wrote:
> >> On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> >>
> >>> To follow up, I went ahead and generated "random" object to scan for a
> >>> common header for a given R
Hi
Luke Tierney wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>
>> To follow up, I went ahead and generated "random" object to scan for a
>> common header for a given R version, and it seems to be that at most
>> the first 18 bytes are non-data specific, which could be the length of
>> th
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Paul Murrell wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> Luke Tierney wrote:
>> On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>>> To follow up, I went ahead and generated "random" object to scan for a
>>> common header for a given R version, and it seems to be that at most
>>> the first 18 bytes are no
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> To follow up, I went ahead and generated "random" object to scan for a
> common header for a given R version, and it seems to be that at most
> the first 18 bytes are non-data specific, which could be the length of
> the serialization header.
>
> Here
