In this method...
setMethod("initialize", "baseClass",
function(.Object, ...) {
print("---initialize:baseClass---")
#.Object <- callNextMethod();
strg <- [EMAIL PROTECTED];
print(paste("base:strg = ", strg))
if (strg == "") {
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <- as.character(getwd());
Seth Falcon fhcrc.org> writes:
> The quick fix for you is, I believe,
>
> if (interactive()) {
> library(fortunes)
> fortune()
> detach("package:fortunes")
> }
>
> Whether something could be changed so that R's output doesn't confuse
> itself and gcc when doing R
Dear Seth
Thank you for your comments. Please see my comments and at the end my
corrected code and output.
Sorrowly, the problem remains the same.
Seth Falcon wrote:
> cstrato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Maybe, I am doing something wrong, but using R-2.5.0 on my Intel-M
cstrato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear all,
>
> Maybe, I am doing something wrong, but using R-2.5.0 on my Intel-Mac, I
> have problems
> using function callNextMethod() in method initialize.
>
> I am loading the following code as file "testS4.R":
I don't think this is the code in the same s
Dear all,
Maybe, I am doing something wrong, but using R-2.5.0 on my Intel-Mac, I
have problems
using function callNextMethod() in method initialize.
I am loading the following code as file "testS4.R":
setClass("baseClass",
representation(myname = "character",
mydir = "cha
Gregor Gorjanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> This is about fortune package, but I think that might be related also to
> base R, so I am sending to package maintainer and R-devel list.
>
> I have the following in my .Rprofile to break monotony of code writing
>
> library(utils)
> library
Hello,
This is about fortune package, but I think that might be related also to
base R, so I am sending to package maintainer and R-devel list.
I have the following in my .Rprofile to break monotony of code writing
library(utils)
library(fortunes)
fortune()
detach("package:fortunes")
so I get a
Simon Urbanek wrote:
> Thanks, Gregor, it should be now fixed in the current R-devel.
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
Which I gladly confirm.
Gregor
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
