Thanks, Seth,
it's now fixed in R-devel.
Cheers,
Simon
On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Seth Falcon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A recent change has R failing to compile (for me) on ppc OSX 10.4.8
> like this:
>
> ../../../../R-devel/src/main/datetime.c: In function `reset_tz':
> ../../../../R-devel/src/mai
On Jan 8, 2007, at 12:47 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Seth Falcon wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> A recent change has R failing to compile (for me) on ppc OSX
>> 10.4.8 like this:
>>
>> ../../../../R-devel/src/main/datetime.c: In function `reset_tz':
>> ../../../../R-devel/src/main/
On 1/8/07, Chris Eisley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Prof Ripley,
>
> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> > I don't undersand what the issues are, but he actually said
> >
> >>> These files make up a package,
> >
> > and all the source files on an R packages are concatenated and loaded
> > into a sing
Hello Prof Ripley,
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> I don't undersand what the issues are, but he actually said
>
>>> These files make up a package,
>
> and all the source files on an R packages are concatenated and loaded
> into a single environment. So my understanding of the answer to
>
>>> I as
The documentation for unlist says:
By default, 'unlist' tries to retain the naming information
present in 'x'. If 'use.names = FALSE' all naming information is
dropped.
Hence, I find it odd that I see the following:
> b <- list("highway1"=1:5)
> unlist(b)
highway11 hi
On Monday 08 January 2007 6:36 am, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> Erik van Zijst wrote:
> > Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
>
>
> >> At some point (years ago) there was even an argument on some mailiing
> >> list (xfree86-devel ?) about whether Xserver should support shared
> >> memory as unix socket was "fas
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Seth Falcon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A recent change has R failing to compile (for me) on ppc OSX 10.4.8 like this:
>
> ../../../../R-devel/src/main/datetime.c: In function `reset_tz':
> ../../../../R-devel/src/main/datetime.c:511: error: void value not ignored as
> it ought to be
>
>
Hi,
I decided to package some functions I wrote. klin is a package that
implements efficient ways to evaluate and solve equations of the form
Ax=b, where A is a kronecker product of matrices. Functions to solve
least squares problems of this type are also included.
The exact algorithm used was
On 1/8/07, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/8/07, Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "Duncan" == Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > on Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:45:31 -0500 writes:
> >
> >Duncan> On 1/1/2007 1:28 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> >
Hi,
A recent change has R failing to compile (for me) on ppc OSX 10.4.8 like this:
../../../../R-devel/src/main/datetime.c: In function `reset_tz':
../../../../R-devel/src/main/datetime.c:511: error: void value not ignored as
it ought to be
I suspect there is some sort of configure magic that n
On 1/8/07, Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Duncan" == Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > on Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:45:31 -0500 writes:
>
>Duncan> On 1/1/2007 1:28 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>> 7. documentation standards for packages - NEWS/ChangeLog
>>>
> "Duncan" == Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:45:31 -0500 writes:
Duncan> On 1/1/2007 1:28 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>> 7. documentation standards for packages - NEWS/ChangeLog
>> (also should be accessible from CRAN page for package and
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> May I chip in at this point - I agree the bug report was invalid, but
> many of the replies were missing the point, as far as I see. It
> wasn't the backslash escape that "Fan" is *mainly* confused about
> (which he obviously is...), but the uses of the d
May I chip in at this point - I agree the bug report was invalid, but
many of the replies were missing the point, as far as I see. It
wasn't the backslash escape that "Fan" is *mainly* confused about
(which he obviously is...), but the uses of the different brackets:
[] ,() .
He/She was expecting
Erik van Zijst wrote:
> Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>> At some point (years ago) there was even an argument on some mailiing list
>> (xfree86-devel ?) about whether Xserver should support shared memory as unix
>> socket was "fast enough" - with the other side arguing that when you pass
>> megabyt
15 matches
Mail list logo