Re: [Rd] Problem with tuned Rblas from CRAN with R-2.4.0

2006-12-12 Thread Uwe Ligges
I just looked into the one for P4 and it does export zdrot_ and works for me. Is your one from CRAN master? Uwe Ligges Daniel Nordlund wrote: > I encountered the following problem in R-2.4.0 for Windows binary downloaded > from CRAN (data from R-help post by Ethan Johnsons). I was also using

[Rd] Problem with tuned Rblas from CRAN with R-2.4.0

2006-12-12 Thread Daniel Nordlund
I encountered the following problem in R-2.4.0 for Windows binary downloaded from CRAN (data from R-help post by Ethan Johnsons). I was also using the contributed binary Rblas.dll for Intel P4 chip. The problem doesn't occur with the default Rblas.dll. x=c(3.05176E-05, 0.000457764, 0.003204

Re: [Rd] Pre-compilation and server-side parallel execution

2006-12-12 Thread Byron Ellis
On 12/8/06, Erik van Zijst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2. R's native C-api > [http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-exts.html#The-R-API] does not > separate parsing from evaluation. When the same script is evaluated 10 > times, it is also parsed 10 times. > > I'm mostly concerned about the secon

Re: [Rd] [R] Segfault in pure R code

2006-12-12 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Göran Broström wrote: > I tried once more under the debugger, and > > ++ > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/R/BEMANNING/Doc$ R -d gdb > GNU gdb 6.5-debian > Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License

Re: [Rd] [R] Segfault in pure R code

2006-12-12 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
That's in the memory manager and indicates prior memory corruption. Please re-run under valgrind, plus gctorture(TRUE) if needed. However, I would start by seeing if this occurs in a single-byte domain if this was in a UTF-8 domain. Experience suggests that we have some flakier code in the les

Re: [Rd] include libraries for C code called from R

2006-12-12 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Just a note: if you do need -L, it would almost certainly be -L/usr/lib64 on this system. As a diagnostic check, try nm -g /mnt/san2/braunm/winshare/braunm/Cpractice/RgslTest.so which will probably have 'U' for lots of symbols from gsl. On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Duncan Temple Lang wrote: > -BEG

Re: [Rd] [R] Segfault in pure R code

2006-12-12 Thread Göran Broström
I tried once more under the debugger, and ++ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/R/BEMANNING/Doc$ R -d gdb GNU gdb 6.5-debian Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it

Re: [Rd] include libraries for C code called from R

2006-12-12 Thread Duncan Temple Lang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michael. [There's no need to send two pieces of mail that are essentially the same issue.] The problem is that when you are creating the shared object gslTestHG.so, you are not telling the linker to combine information from the libgsl.so or libg

Re: [Rd] Undefined symbol when trying to dyn.load a shared object

2006-12-12 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 12/12/2006 4:03 PM, Michael Braun wrote: > I hope that someone reading this list can offer some suggestions on how I can > incorporate external C libraries in C functions that I want to call from R. > I have gone through all of the documentation, help files and mailing list > archives and ha

Re: [Rd] Conditional suggest

2006-12-12 Thread Seth Falcon
Kurt wrote: >> This is not "enhancing" the way it is currently implemented, which is >> allowing for the possibility to provide S3 or S4 methods for classes >> from another package without actively suggesting it (thus enhancing >> it). By provide an S4 method for a class, I guess you mean define

[Rd] Undefined symbol when trying to dyn.load a shared object

2006-12-12 Thread Michael Braun
I hope that someone reading this list can offer some suggestions on how I can incorporate external C libraries in C functions that I want to call from R. I have gone through all of the documentation, help files and mailing list archives and have not been able to find a satisfactory solution. I

[Rd] include libraries for C code called from R

2006-12-12 Thread braunm
I hope that someone on this list can help me with this issue. I have searched through all of the documentation and mail archives for a solution, but have been unable to find an answer that addresses my particular problem directly. Suppose I am writing some C code that I want to access from R thro

[Rd] Conditional suggest (was Re: Enhances, require() and quality control)

2006-12-12 Thread Gregor Gorjanc
Kurt Hornik wrote: >> Gregor Gorjanc writes: ... >> I might have understood Enhances field wrongly but imagine this >> situation. I have a package A and if I can use package B I would like to >> use it otherwise try with "my own" solution. I thought that Enhances >> fields is exactly for such s

Re: [Rd] data frame subset patch, take 2

2006-12-12 Thread Robert Gentleman
Hi, I tried take 1, and it failed. I have been traveling (and with Martin's changes also waiting for things to stabilize) before trying take 2, probably later this week and I will send an email if it goes in. Anyone wanting to try it and run R through check and check-all is welcome to do so a

Re: [Rd] data frame subset patch, take 2

2006-12-12 Thread Marcus G. Daniels
Hi Martin, Conventions for optimizing away long, useless row name vector sound very useful. Nice timings too! I've noticed that before, and not been sure quite what to do. e.g. the hdf5 module just gives up past a certain threshold as the long vectors cause performance problems and HDF5 doesn

Re: [Rd] data frame subset patch, take 2

2006-12-12 Thread Martin Maechler
> "Marcus" == Marcus G Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:05:15 -0700 writes: Marcus> Vladimir Dergachev wrote: >> Here is the second iteration of data frame subset patch. >> It now passes make check on both 2.4.0 and 2.5.0 (svn as >> of a few days ago

Re: [Rd] data frame subset patch, take 2

2006-12-12 Thread Marcus G. Daniels
Vladimir Dergachev wrote: > Here is the second iteration of data frame subset patch. > It now passes make check on both 2.4.0 and 2.5.0 (svn as of a few days ago). > Same speedup as before. > Hi, I was wondering if this patch would make it into the next release. I don't see it in SVN, but it'

[Rd] Documenting revised functions

2006-12-12 Thread jhallman
I am running into some problems with the way R CMD check looks at documentation. The stats::filter function returns a time series with class "ts" or c("mts", "ts") if it is multivariate. I have created a more capable time series class called "tis" as part of my fame package. My package redefine

Re: [Rd] Enhances, require() and quality control

2006-12-12 Thread Gregor Gorjanc
Kurt Hornik wrote: >> Gregor Gorjanc writes: > >> Hello! > >> I am working on a package where Enhances field seems to be a plausible >> option. When I add package, say coda, to this field, I get the >> following warning with recent R-devel: > >> > >> * checking for working latex ... OK