Re: [Rd] Source references from the parser

2006-11-28 Thread Duncan Murdoch
There have been a couple of requests to set the keep.source default to FALSE (i.e. not to enable the new behaviour), so I've done that. Hopefully the code will still be exercised enough that we can have confidence in it by April. Duncan Murdoch __ R-

Re: [Rd] Bug in tkStartGUI in package tcltk (PR#9396)

2006-11-28 Thread Peter Dalgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name: Jeff Hallman > Version: 2.4.0 > OS: Linux > Submission from: (NULL) (132.200.32.34) > > > When the R Internals manual was added to the list of manuals in tkStartGUI, > whoever did it left an extra comma in the code. This creates an ugly warning > when tkStartG

Re: [Rd] Is there a version of RMySQL for Windows?

2006-11-28 Thread Henric Nilsson
Den 2006-11-27 14:33, Roger D. Peng skrev: > There are some pre-built binaries here: > > http://stat.bell-labs.com/RS-DBI/download/index.html And an even newer one, for the current version of R, is here: http://bus.cba.utulsa.edu/byersj/Research.asp HTH, Henric > > -roger > > Michal Okonie

[Rd] Bug in tkStartGUI in package tcltk (PR#9396)

2006-11-28 Thread jhallman
Full_Name: Jeff Hallman Version: 2.4.0 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (132.200.32.34) When the R Internals manual was added to the list of manuals in tkStartGUI, whoever did it left an extra comma in the code. This creates an ugly warning when tkStartGUI is invoked. Here is a patch file to f

Re: [Rd] package tseries: plot.irts() - time axis label pb (PR#9387)

2006-11-28 Thread Fan
Thanks Gabor, tested ok with: R version 2.4.0 Patched (2006-11-23 r39958) Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > When I try it with R > "R version 2.4.0 Patched (2006-10-24 r39722)" > on Windows XP and the same version of tseries as yours I get > tick marks labelled 1992, 1994, 1996, 1998. > > Try it again

[Rd] data frame subset patch

2006-11-28 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
Hi all, Here is a patch that significantly speeds up `[.data.frame` operator. It applies cleanly to both 2.4.0 and svn trunk. Make check was OK for 2.40. (for svn trunk it fails even without this patch.. ). What it does - we get rid of class and attr statements that modify incoming data

Re: [Rd] ccf documentation bug or suggeston (PR#9394)

2006-11-28 Thread murdoch
On 11/28/2006 12:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 11/28/2006 11:50 AM, A.I. McLeod wrote: >> Hi Duncan, > > Hi Ian. > >> >> ccf(x,y) does not explain whether c(k)=cov(x(t),x(t+k)) or >> d(k)=cov(x(t),x(t-k)) is calculated. The following example demonstrates >> that the c(k) definition is

Re: [Rd] ccf documentation bug or suggeston (PR#9394)

2006-11-28 Thread murdoch
On 11/28/2006 11:50 AM, A.I. McLeod wrote: > Hi Duncan, Hi Ian. > > ccf(x,y) does not explain whether c(k)=cov(x(t),x(t+k)) or > d(k)=cov(x(t),x(t-k)) is calculated. The following example demonstrates > that the c(k) definition is used: > ccf(c(-1,1,rep(0,8)),c(1,rep(0,9))) > However S-Plus a

[Rd] ccf documentation bug or suggeston

2006-11-28 Thread A.I. McLeod
Hi Duncan, ccf(x,y) does not explain whether c(k)=cov(x(t),x(t+k)) or d(k)=cov(x(t),x(t-k)) is calculated. The following example demonstrates that the c(k) definition is used: ccf(c(-1,1,rep(0,8)),c(1,rep(0,9))) However S-Plus acf uses the d(k) definition in their acf function. For interpretiv

[Rd] ccf documentation bug or suggeston (PR#9393)

2006-11-28 Thread aim
Hi Duncan, ccf(x,y) does not explain whether c(k)=cov(x(t),x(t+k)) or d(k)=cov(x(t),x(t-k)) is calculated. The following example demonstrates that the c(k) definition is used: ccf(c(-1,1,rep(0,8)),c(1,rep(0,9))) However S-Plus acf uses the d(k) definition in their acf function. For interpretiv

Re: [Rd] when loading library tripack entry point "signal" in rgui.exe (PR#9392)

2006-11-28 Thread ligges
This is not a bug in R. Please read the FAQs! You have got a version of tripack that has been compiled for R < 2.4.0. Please type update.packages(checkBuilt = TRUE) and try again. Best, Uwe Ligges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name: Erkan YILMAZ > Version: 2.4.0 > OS: XP > Submission from:

Re: [Rd] (PR#9390) when loading library tripack entry point "signal"

2006-11-28 Thread ripley
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --27464147-1814661816-1164717477=:6146 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT This is definit

Re: [Rd] (PR#9390) when loading library tripack entry point "signal"

2006-11-28 Thread ripley
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --27464147-1968795515-1164715405=:5670 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT You need to re-

[Rd] addition to R-bug (PR#9391)

2006-11-28 Thread erkan77
Hi, I created before a bug-entry: http://bugs.r-project.org/cgi-bin/R/incoming?id=3D9390;expression=3Derkan;u= ser=3Dguest here is an addition which I can not add because the interface won't let me: more info: tripack_1.2-10.zip: file version of tripack.dll: 2.10.50418.0 before installing trip

[Rd] when loading library tripack entry point "signal" in rgui.exe not found (PR#9390)

2006-11-28 Thread erkan77
Full_Name: Erkan YILMAZ Version: 2.4.0 OS: XP Submission from: (NULL) (85.180.116.228) Hi, just installed R 2.4.0 (before there was running 2.2.0). when loading the library ("library(tripack)"), there appears a pop up, see following picture: http://www.skilledtester.de/R/r240_tripack.JPG -> th