On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Douglas Bates wrote:
[...]
> However, I think it exposes a problem with R CMD INSTALL. If there is
> a LinkingTo: directive in the DESCRIPTION file and the package's
> include directory cannot be found I think that R CMD INSTALL should
> abort.
That was a deliberate design d
There's a problem new to R2.4.0 when rbinding an auto-row-named
data.frame to a list:
> rbind( data.frame( x=1), list( x=2))
Error in attr(value, "row.names") <- rlabs :
row names must be 'character' or 'integer', not 'double'
Works OK with 2 data.frames or 2 lists.
Mark Bravington
CSIR
Hi all,
I was looking at the data frame subscription operator (attached in the end
of this e-mail) and got puzzled by the following line:
class(x) <- attr(x, "row.names") <- NULL
This appears to set the class and row.names attributes of the incoming data
frame to NULL. So far I was no
On Monday 06 November 2006 6:12 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> version.string Version 2.3.0 (2006-04-24)
>
> > x<-matrix(nrow=44000,ncol=48000)
> > y<-matrix(nrow=44000,ncol=48000)
> > z<-matrix(nrow=44000,ncol=48000)
> > gc()
>
> used(Mb) gc trigger(Mb) max used(Mb)
> Nce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Full_Name: Don Maszle
> Version: 2.3.0
> OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> Submission from: (NULL) (206.86.87.3)
>
>
> # On our new 32 GB x86_64 machine
>
> R : Copyright 2006, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
> Version 2.3.0 (2006-04-24)
> ISBN 3-900051-07-0
"Derek Stephen Elmerick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter,
>=20
> I ran the memory limit function you mention below and both versions provi=
de
> the same result:
>=20
> >
> > memory.limit(size=3D4095)
> NULL
> > memory.limit(NA)
> [1] 4293918720
> >
> I do have 4GB ram on my PC. As a more repr
"Derek Stephen Elmerick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter,
>
> I ran the memory limit function you mention below and both versions provide
> the same result:
>
> >
> > memory.limit(size=4095)
> NULL
> > memory.limit(NA)
> [1] 4293918720
> >
> I do have 4GB ram on my PC. As a more reproducible
Full_Name: Don Maszle
Version: 2.3.0
OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Submission from: (NULL) (206.86.87.3)
# On our new 32 GB x86_64 machine
R : Copyright 2006, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Version 2.3.0 (2006-04-24)
ISBN 3-900051-07-0
R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO
Peter,
I ran the memory limit function you mention below and both versions provide
the same result:
memory.limit(size=4095)
NULL
memory.limit(NA)
[1] 4293918720
I do have 4GB ram on my PC. As a more reproducible form of the test, I
have attached output that uses a randomly generated data
Hi Luke,
Thank you for the patient reply !
I have looked into the issue a little deeper, comments below:
On Thursday 02 November 2006 11:26 pm, Luke Tierney wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was looking at the following piece of code in src/ma
"Derek Stephen Elmerick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for the replies. Point taken regarding submission protocol. I have
> included a text file attachment that shows the R output with version 2.3.=
0and
> 2.4.0. A label distinguishing the version is included in the comments.
>=20
> A quick
"Derek Stephen Elmerick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for the replies. Point taken regarding submission protocol. I have
> included a text file attachment that shows the R output with version 2.3.0and
> 2.4.0. A label distinguishing the version is included in the comments.
>
> A quick bac
Thanks for the replies. Point taken regarding submission protocol. I have
included a text file attachment that shows the R output with version 2.3.0and
2.4.0. A label distinguishing the version is included in the comments.
A quick background on the attached example. The dataset has 650,000 record
"Derek Stephen Elmerick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> thanks for the friendly reply. i think my description was fairly clear: i
> import a large dataset and run a model. using the same dataset, the
> process worked previously and it doesn't work now. if the new version of R
> requires more memory
"Derek Stephen Elmerick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> thanks for the friendly reply. i think my description was fairly clear: i
> import a large dataset and run a model. using the same dataset, the
> process worked previously and it doesn't work now. if the new version of R
> requires more memory
It would be helpful to produce a script that reproduces the error on =20
your system. And include details on the size of your data set and =20
what you are doing with it. It is unclear what function is actually =20
causing the error and such. Really, in order to do something about it =20=
you need
It would be helpful to produce a script that reproduces the error on
your system. And include details on the size of your data set and
what you are doing with it. It is unclear what function is actually
causing the error and such. Really, in order to do something about it
you need to show h
thanks for the friendly reply. i think my description was fairly clear: i
import a large dataset and run a model. using the same dataset, the
process worked previously and it doesn't work now. if the new version of R
requires more memory and this compromises some basic data analyses, i would
label
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Full_Name: Derek Elmerick
> Version: 2.4.0
> OS: Windows XP
> Submission from: (NULL) (38.117.162.243)
>
>
>
> hello -
>
> i have some code that i run regularly using R version 2.3.x . the final step
> of
> the code is to build a multinomial logit model. the datase
Full_Name: Derek Elmerick
Version: 2.4.0
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (38.117.162.243)
hello -
i have some code that i run regularly using R version 2.3.x . the final step of
the code is to build a multinomial logit model. the dataset is large; however, i
have not had issues in the pa
On 06 Nov 2006 15:41:11 +0100, Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Douglas Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 31 Oct 2006 12:05:21 +0100, Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > [move to r-devel, put maintainer in loop]
> > >
> > > Patrick Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Douglas Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 31 Oct 2006 12:05:21 +0100, Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > [move to r-devel, put maintainer in loop]
> >
> > Patrick Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Mon, 30-Oct-2006 at 04:44PM -0500, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> > >
On 31 Oct 2006 12:05:21 +0100, Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [move to r-devel, put maintainer in loop]
>
> Patrick Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 30-Oct-2006 at 04:44PM -0500, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> >
> >
> > |> Try "R CMD printenv R_HOME" and you'll find which
> -Original Message-
> From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 November 2006 11:42
> To: Keith Ponting
> Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] CRAN task views work only once per session (PR#9330)
>
> I think the following item in NEWS for R-patched may be rele
I think the following item in NEWS for R-patched may be relevant:
o load()ing from a connection had a logic bug in when it closed
the connection. (PR#9271)
so please try R-patched.
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Keith Ponting wrote:
> Thankyou to those who have replied to this thread.
>
>
Thankyou to those who have replied to this thread.
I have now reproduced similar effects in a way which does not directly
involve CRAN task views. (I have also reproduced the original problem on
a different machine within
our site and using a different mirror.)
The following sequence of commands
26 matches
Mail list logo
