Re: [Rd] Discussion starter for package level Connection API

2006-10-09 Thread Jeffrey Horner
Here's a function to create new connections. It returns and SEXP that can be returned to R code, but before that, the user can set up all the function pointer members via passing in the address of an Rconnection. Here's how you'd call it: SEXP newcon; Rconnection conptr; newcon = R_NewConnecti

[Rd] boxplot, notches, etc.

2006-10-09 Thread Ben Bolker
Sorry to repost this, but it looks like it's getting buried in r-help (originally posted October 5: my experience says that if it hasn't been answered by then it won't be). I wouldn't bother, but I'm worried that r-devel might be better, *and* a previous e-mail of mine on the subject in January

[Rd] Discussion starter for package level Connection API

2006-10-09 Thread Jeffrey Horner
Thought I'd try and start a discussion. Feel free to jump in. I guess R needs to strike the right balance between opening up the internals to package writers and not allowing them to do bad things. My first attempt at cracking this nut is to just memcpy() the Rconnection and not allow access to

[Rd] header containing (PR#9171)

2006-10-09 Thread JLewis
Another example where the "Warning message: full precision was not achieved in 'pnt'" is given is qt(.95,15,12) which returns the value 17.63181788577 in R2.4.0. By symmetry, this value should be identical to -qt(.05,15,-12) which returns without warning the value 17.631817885623 in R2

[Rd] Installing Rmpi on 64-bit Linux Athlon

2006-10-09 Thread McGehee, Robert
Hello, We have recently added a 64-bit 2 x Dual-Core Athlon server running Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 to allow for processing of large data sets (>4GB) in R. To integrate this server into our Linux cluster, I have been trying (unsuccessfully) to use Rmpi/lam-mpi to parallel process some

Re: [Rd] Where to put sgml file

2006-10-09 Thread Friedrich Leisch
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 11:46:51 -0400, > Gabor Grothendieck (GG) wrote: > I have a package that will have an sgml file. One of the demos in ./demo > will use it. Where should I put it? > I tried putting it in ./demo but it did not survive the build so > currently I put it in ./ins

Re: [Rd] Where to put sgml file

2006-10-09 Thread Roger Bivand
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > I have a package that will have an sgml file. One of the demos in ./demo > will use it. Where should I put it? > > I tried putting it in ./demo but it did not survive the build so > currently I put it in ./inst and it gets copied to the same level

[Rd] Where to put sgml file

2006-10-09 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
I have a package that will have an sgml file. One of the demos in ./demo will use it. Where should I put it? I tried putting it in ./demo but it did not survive the build so currently I put it in ./inst and it gets copied to the same level as the DESCRIPTION file and the demo gets it from there.

Re: [Rd] operator :: and symbols not in the namespace of a package with a namespace

2006-10-09 Thread Luke Tierney
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Luke Tierney wrote: > >> On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >> >>> On 10/6/2006 9:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Thomas Friedrichsmeier Version: 2.4.0 OS: GNU/Linux Submission from: (NULL) (8

Re: [Rd] operator :: and symbols not in the namespace of a package with a namespace

2006-10-09 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Luke Tierney wrote: > On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > >> On 10/6/2006 9:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Full_Name: Thomas Friedrichsmeier >>> Version: 2.4.0 >>> OS: GNU/Linux >>> Submission from: (NULL) (84.61.116.51) >>> >>> >>> Since R 2.4.0, operator "::" als

Re: [Rd] dump (PR#9282)

2006-10-09 Thread Brian Ripley
This is not an error in R: the later format is more correct R. Those packages have made unwarranted assumptions about the format produced by dump(), so please reports bugs in them to their maintainers. On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name: Ricardo Ehlers > Version: 2.4.0 >

[Rd] dump (PR#9282)

2006-10-09 Thread ehlers
Full_Name: Ricardo Ehlers Version: 2.4.0 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (200.138.34.134) The dump function is outputing something different from previous versions. For example > a <- c(1,2,3); dump('a',file='test') now results in `a` <- c(1,2) instead of "a" <- c(1,2) in the file 'test' Thi

Re: [Rd] Default argument value for "["

2006-10-09 Thread Iago Mosqueira
El vie, 06-10-2006 a las 10:16 -0400, John Chambers escribió: > Should now be fixed in r-devel and 2.4 patched. Hi, I am now working with R-devel. I am finding this problem with the same code. When the package is installed and loaded, '[' fails with > [EMAIL PROTECTED],1] Error: subindex out of

[Rd] Italian Wine Tour (PR#9281)

2006-10-09 Thread usa90100
--Boundary_(ID_6VG5ntkkKoC/+iJCJpG2RQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] --Boundary_(ID_6VG5ntkkKoC/+iJCJpG2RQ) Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT --Boundary_(ID_6VG5ntkkKoC/+iJCJpG2RQ)-