Re: [Rd] Help for methods

2006-09-29 Thread hadley wickham
> Yes, I agree that the current help system doesn't work very well on S3 > methods. But I don't know how to fix it. I think the only way it could > know what to do on a construction like > > ?summary(lm(...)) > > would be to actually evaluate summary(lm(...)) (or maybe just lm(...)), > and I thin

Re: [Rd] Help for methods

2006-09-29 Thread hadley wickham
> I think the spirit of Hadley's request could be handled by introducing a > declaration for S3 methods and by inserting S4-style alias{} lines into > their documentation. For example, if a function, say > setOldGeneric("summary"), similar to setOldClass, informed the system that > "summary" was

[Rd] Strange behaviour of the [[ operator

2006-09-29 Thread Herve Pages
Hi, This looks like a bug: > a <- list(b=5) > a[['b']] [1] 5 > a[[t<-'b']] Nothing gets printed! I need to use parenthesis to see the expected result: > a[[(t<-'b')]] [1] 5 Cheers, H. __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list h

[Rd] Possible bug in Rcons_vprintf

2006-09-29 Thread Jeffrey Horner
In R-2-4-branch r39548, Rcons_vprintf is called from stdout_vfprintf when R_Outputfile is NULL. When called and output is greater than R_BUFSIZE, output is truncated to R_BUFSIZE. Here's a one-line fix: Index: src/main/printutils.c ==

Re: [Rd] Warning: a final empty element has been omitted

2006-09-29 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
By the way, this seems to be a difference between 2.3.1pat and 2.4.0 since I get the warning using list on "R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-16 r39365)" but not on "Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-06-04 r38279)" On 9/29/06, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is a kludge: > > List <-

Re: [Rd] Warning: a final empty element has been omitted

2006-09-29 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
Here is a kludge: List <- function(...) { mc <- match.call() mc <- mc[as.list(mc) != ""] mc[[1]] <- as.name("list") eval(mc, parent.frame()) } List(1,2,3,) On 9/29/06, hadley wickham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How can I suppress this warning? > > > options(warn

Re: [Rd] Warning: a final empty element has been omitted

2006-09-29 Thread hadley wickham
Sorry I should have mentioned: platform i386-apple-darwin8.7.1 arch i386 os darwin8.7.1 system i386, darwin8.7.1 status beta major 2 minor 4.0 year 2006 month 09 day20 svn rev39433 language R

[Rd] Warning: a final empty element has been omitted

2006-09-29 Thread hadley wickham
How can I suppress this warning? > options(warn = -10) > list(1,2,3,) Warning: a final empty element has been omitted the part of the args list of 'list' being evaluated was: (1, 2, 3, ) [[1]] [1] 1 [[2]] [1] 2 [[3]] [1] 3 > suppressWarnings(list(1,)) Warning: a final empty element has been

Re: [Rd] error location

2006-09-29 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Peter Stencel wrote: > Dear all, > > I've written a (quite long) function in R. While running it I get the > following error message: > > Error in "[<-"(`*tmp*`, 1, 13, value = > NULL) : >number of items to replace is not a multiple of > replacement length > operatio

Re: [Rd] Build error/zlib question

2006-09-29 Thread James W. MacDonald
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Uwe Ligges wrote: > >> >> >> James MacDonald wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am unable to build a package I maintain using a relatively >>> current build of R-2.4.0 alpha, whereas the package builds just >>> fine on R-2.3.1. Both versions of R were b

[Rd] error location

2006-09-29 Thread Peter Stencel
Dear all, I've written a (quite long) function in R. While running it I get the following error message: Error in "[<-"(`*tmp*`, 1, 13, value = NULL) : number of items to replace is not a multiple of replacement length operation failed in: function () !!! evaluation not successfu

Re: [Rd] Build error/zlib question

2006-09-29 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Uwe Ligges wrote: > > > James MacDonald wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am unable to build a package I maintain using a relatively current >> build of R-2.4.0 alpha, whereas the package builds just fine on R-2.3.1. >> Both versions of R were built from source. I'm hoping a guRu might be

Re: [Rd] Build error/zlib question

2006-09-29 Thread Uwe Ligges
James MacDonald wrote: > Hi, > > I am unable to build a package I maintain using a relatively current > build of R-2.4.0 alpha, whereas the package builds just fine on R-2.3.1. > Both versions of R were built from source. I'm hoping a guRu might be > able to give some help. The entry points ar

Re: [Rd] R CMD build when the package name is different from the directory name

2006-09-29 Thread Uwe Ligges
Arne Henningsen wrote: > Dear Seth, > > Thank you for your message. > > On Thursday 28 September 2006 16:22, Seth Falcon wrote: >> Arne Henningsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was really happy when I saw that in R version 2.3.0 "R CMD check" works >>> for packages whose package

Re: [Rd] unable to load lapack.so

2006-09-29 Thread Hiroyuki Kawakatsu
On 9/28/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm having problems using ACML with R. I made two changes in >> config.site by setting >> LDFLAGS="-L/opt/acml3.1.0/gnu64/lib" >> BLAS_LIBS="-lacml" > >That's not how the R-admin manual describes how to do this. >Please try the way it doe

Re: [Rd] unable to load lapack.so

2006-09-29 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Hiroyuki Kawakatsu wrote: > On 9/28/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> I'm having problems using ACML with R. I made two changes in >>> config.site by setting >>> LDFLAGS="-L/opt/acml3.1.0/gnu64/lib" >>> BLAS_LIBS="-lacml" >> >> That's not how the R-admin