On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Parlamis Franklin wrote:
>
>> self-sanity check prior to filing a bug report:
>>
>> attempted replacement that generates an error leaves a '*tmp*'
>> variable in the global environment.
>>
>> test <- 1:10
>> test[2:4] <- expres
Hi,
namespaceImportFrom in base/R/namespace.R has the following:
fdef <- methods:::getGeneric(genName, impenv)
The definition of getGeneric is in methods/R/RMethodUtils.R starts
with:
getGeneric <-
## return the definition of the function named f as a generic.
##
##
It also wouldn't cover objects constructed by external functions (a
lot of my code produces these creatures).
On 9/21/06, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/21/2006 5:29 PM, Parlamis Franklin wrote:
> > 'methods' package feature request / discussion starter:
> >
> > perhaps a call t
On 9/21/2006 5:29 PM, Parlamis Franklin wrote:
> 'methods' package feature request / discussion starter:
>
> perhaps a call to 'validObject' should occur at part of any slot
> replacement operation (and the operation not be carried out if it
> would invalidate the object)? this may prevent th
'methods' package feature request / discussion starter:
perhaps a call to 'validObject' should occur at part of any slot
replacement operation (and the operation not be carried out if it
would invalidate the object)? this may prevent the need for
prophylactic 'validObject' calls in other us
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> "JohnF" == John Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:22:17 -0400 writes:
>
>JohnF> Dear list members,
>
>JohnF> I'm encountering the following problem with package dependencies and
>JohnF> imports:
>
>JohnF> Th
Dear Martin and Kurt,
Adding "Enhances: rgl" to the description file did the trick!
Thank you,
John
John Fox
Department of Sociology
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario
Canada L8S 4M4
905-525-9140x23604
http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox
Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I think you should use the new DESCRIPTION field and say
> 'Enhances: rgl'
>
> but I haven't checked if this prevents the warning, though I
> think it should..
But is Rcmdr enhancing rgl or being enhanced by rgl?
:-( :-(
__
I could use some help understanding how nls parses the formula argument
to a model.frame and estimates the model. I am trying to utilize the
functionality of the nls formula argument to modify garchFit() to handle
other variables in the mean equation besides just an arma(u,v)
specification.
My no
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 16:08 +0200, Jean lobry wrote:
> Marc,
>
> >I have a large .Rnw file and was in the process of doing some debugging.
> >I had set some R chunks to 'eval=false' in the process. This resulted in
> >some R objects not being created that were in turn used in the
> >subsequent \Se
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 16:40 +0200, Friedrich Leisch wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:07:26 -0700,
> > Seth Falcon (SF) wrote:
>
> > "Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> 2006/9/20, Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>> Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "JohnF" == John Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:22:17 -0400 writes:
JohnF> Dear list members,
JohnF> I'm encountering the following problem with package dependencies and
JohnF> imports:
JohnF> The Rcmdr package doesn't declare a formal dependency
Dear list members,
I'm encountering the following problem with package dependencies and
imports:
The Rcmdr package doesn't declare a formal dependency (via depends or
suggests in the package DESCRIPTION) on the rgl package because the latter
apparently causes problems on some systems. This allow
[shameless plug]
Jean lobry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> <>=
> x <- rnorm(100)
> ...
> @
>
> I have \Sexpr{ifelse(exists("x"), length(x), "Ooops, I forgot
> to evaluate TimeConsumingCodeChunk1")} elements in vector x.
For the case of TimeConsumingCodeChunks, another solution is the
weaver packag
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:07:26 -0700,
> Seth Falcon (SF) wrote:
> "Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 2006/9/20, Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> > ..not to mention TeX comments inside Sexpr (e.g. %*%...). Skip
Marc,
>I have a large .Rnw file and was in the process of doing some debugging.
>I had set some R chunks to 'eval=false' in the process. This resulted in
>some R objects not being created that were in turn used in the
>subsequent \Sexpr's.
I have often the same problem, I'm using a construct like
Hi,
It looks that not all function in R could be implemented by RSPerl. For
example, when I call
&R::callWithNames("boxplot", {'',@y1});
or
R::barplot([EMAIL PROTECTED]);
There would be error:
Error in -0.01 * height : non-numeric argument to binary operator
Caught error in R::call()
The sam
If a lean-and-mean version is needed for specialized use, there should
be indeed a mechanism to run without whatever pieces are supposed to be
inefficient.
However, the current treatment of S3 methods as internal and S4 methods
as external perpetuates an inferior programming mechanism as the
a
Hello
got it:
o The printing of complex numbers has changed, handling numbers
as a whole rather than in two parts. So both real and
imaginary parts are shown to the same accuracy, with the
'digits' parameter referring to the accuracy of the larger
component,
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> "Robin" == Robin Hankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:05:24 +0100 writes:
>
>Robin> Hello everyone
>Robin> I am finding complex numbers to be printed oddly in R-alpha.
>
>
>>> 1e100+1e100i
>Robin> [1] 1e+100
> "Robin" == Robin Hankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:05:24 +0100 writes:
Robin> Hello everyone
Robin> I am finding complex numbers to be printed oddly in R-alpha.
>> 1e100+1e100i
Robin> [1] 1e+100+1e+100i
>> 1e100 + 1e44i
Robin> [1] 1e+100+10
Hello everybody
I'm trying to write an Rd file so that the resulting LaTeX-ed document
includes a matrix.
Here is the line in question:
\deqn{
E_\theta\left(
\begin{array}{cc}
1 & x\theta\\
x\theta & x^2\theta^2
\end{array}\right)
}{ommitted: see dvi}
which loo
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Martin Maechler wrote:
[...]
> For the mid to longer term I agree a modify() generic might be
> nicer, and the method for "function" may even be more useful
> than the one for list [[and modifyList() would eventually be deprecated]].
>
> OTOH, for new generics, I'd tend to a
> "DeepS" == Deepayan Sarkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:48:52 -0700 writes:
DeepS> On 9/19/06, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Perhaps it should have another name, be made generic and extended
>> to functions in which case it would work on
Hello everyone
I am finding complex numbers to be printed oddly in R-alpha.
> 1e100+1e100i
[1] 1e+100+1e+100i
> 1e100 + 1e44i
[1] 1e+100+18821361405306422640701865984i
> dput(1e100+1e44i)
1e+100+18821361405306422640701865984i
>
[same thing at home on a linux
25 matches
Mail list logo
