Re: [Rd] Windows MinGW compiler clarification, consequences

On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Martin Morgan wrote: > The information at > > http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#The-MinGW-compilers The R 2.3.0 manual is current. > and > > http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/ > > is slightly inconsistent about the compiler used to build Windows > bin

[Rd] Windows MinGW compiler clarification, consequences

The information at http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#The-MinGW-compilers and http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/ is slightly inconsistent about the compiler used to build Windows binary packages available through cran. The 'candidate' package of the recommended MinGW-5.0

Re: [Rd] libtrio

On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I usually compile R-devel tarball every few days (just to check if I can do > it and check for any compile errors). As of two days ago, I am receiving > the following error: > > ... > gcc -O3 -I. -DWIN32 -D_X86_ -c xdr_mem.c -o xdr_mem.o >

[Rd] Daily package check and --install=no

R-devel, There has been some confusion on the MatchIt package mailing list on the meaning of [--install=no] in the comment column of CRAN's automated package check. It's my understanding that, at the very least, a package marked like this will not have its test cases run each night. Are there ot

[Rd] libtrio

Hi, I usually compile R-devel tarball every few days (just to check if I can do it and check for any compile errors). As of two days ago, I am receiving the following error: ... gcc -O3 -I. -DWIN32 -D_X86_ -c xdr_mem.c -o xdr_mem.o ar crs libxdr.a xdr.o xdr_float.o xdr_stdio.o xdr_mem.o make:

Re: [Rd] RSetReg.exe

Note that there also exists a front end to RSetReg that is may be useful if you have multiple versions of R installed at the same time, found in: http://cran.r-project.org/contrib/extra/batchfiles/ with the most recent version being: batchfiles-0.2-7.zip There is a command line version, Rvers

[Rd] RSetReg.exe

R v2.3.0 patched from today: Was just checking out the RSetReg.exe application after reading about it in "R for Windows FAQ": "After installation you can add the Registry entries in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE by running RSetReg.exe in the bin folder, and remove them by running this with argument /U. Note

[Rd] make: sockconn.c; make check: eval-etc.R; make install: $(EXPORTFILES) (PR#8809)

I got several errors while installing R version 2.3.0 One error while running 'make': make[4]: Binnengaan van map `/home/peter/tmp/R-2.3.0/src/modules/internet' gcc -I. -I../../../src/include -I../../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fpic -g -O2 -c Rs

Re: [Rd] R 2.3.0: Use of NULL as an environment is deprecated

From: Uwe Ligges > > Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote: > > > Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote: > > > > > >>Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Dear R-Devel subscriber, > >>> > >>>first, let me express my thank to the R-Core team for the new > >>>release! > >> > >>I > >> > >> > >>>appreciate their

Re: [Rd] R 2.3.0: Use of NULL as an environment is deprecated

Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote: > Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote: > > >>Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote: >> >> >> >>>Dear R-Devel subscriber, >>> >>>first, let me express my thank to the R-Core team for the new release! >> >>I >> >> >>>appreciate their efforts and time spent to enhance R. >>>In accordance with

Re: [Rd] protection needed?

On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Hans-Peter wrote: > Dear list, > > I am unsure if I really need to protect a coerced object if I > immediately access its value and don't access the object anymore. I > tried to find out by looking into the R sources but didn't find > something similar. > > It's about the vari

[Rd] protection needed?

Dear list, I am unsure if I really need to protect a coerced object if I immediately access its value and don't access the object anymore. I tried to find out by looking into the R sources but didn't find something similar. It's about the variable _skipLines in the call "function ReadXls( _file,

Re: [Rd] R 2.3.0: Use of NULL as an environment is deprecated

Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote: > Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote: > > >>Dear R-Devel subscriber, >> >>first, let me express my thank to the R-Core team for the new release! > > I > >>appreciate their efforts and time spent to enhance R. >>In accordance with the 'NEWS' file (see excerpt of it below), >>

Re: [Rd] R 2.3.0: Use of NULL as an environment is deprecated

Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote: > Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote: > > >>Dear R-Devel subscriber, >> >>first, let me express my thank to the R-Core team for the new release! > > I > >>appreciate their efforts and time spent to enhance R. >>In accordance with the 'NEWS' file (see excerpt of it below), >>

Re: [Rd] R 2.3.0: Use of NULL as an environment is deprecated

> "BernPf" == Pfaff, Bernhard Dr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:47:59 +0100 writes: BernPf> Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote: >> Dear R-Devel subscriber, >> >> first, let me express my thank to the R-Core team for the >> new release! BernPf> I >> app

Re: [Rd] R 2.3.0: Use of NULL as an environment is deprecated

Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote: > Dear R-Devel subscriber, > > first, let me express my thank to the R-Core team for the new release! I > appreciate their efforts and time spent to enhance R. > In accordance with the 'NEWS' file (see excerpt of it below), > > [... > o Changed the environment tre

Re: [Rd] R 2.3.0: Use of NULL as an environment is deprecated

Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote: > Dear R-Devel subscriber, > > first, let me express my thank to the R-Core team for the new release! I > appreciate their efforts and time spent to enhance R. > In accordance with the 'NEWS' file (see excerpt of it below), > > [... > o Changed the environment tre

[Rd] R 2.3.0: Use of NULL as an environment is deprecated

Dear R-Devel subscriber, first, let me express my thank to the R-Core team for the new release! I appreciate their efforts and time spent to enhance R. In accordance with the 'NEWS' file (see excerpt of it below), [... o Changed the environment tree to be rooted in an empty environ