Re: [Rd] Quicker quantiles?

2006-03-11 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Please do the comparison with R-devel. That has a different policy, including switching to quicksort when partial has more than 10 elements. BTW you need to compare with quicksort (which suffices here and is quite a lot faster than shellsort for large numeric vectors). For 1 million+1 I am gett

[Rd] Quicker quantiles?

2006-03-11 Thread roger koenker
Motivated by Deepayan's recent inquiries about the efficiency of the R 'quantile' function: http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/devel/05/11/3305.html http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/devel/06/03/4358.html I decided to try to revive an old project to implement a version of the

Re: [Rd] Peculiar timing result

2006-03-11 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Here is a summary of some results on a dual Opteron 252 running FC3 64-bit gcc 3.4.5 R's blas34.83 3.45 38.56 ATLAS 36.70 3.28 40.14 ATLAS multithread 76.85 5.39 82.29 Goto 1 thread 36.17 3.44 39.76 Goto multithread 178.06 345.97 467.99 A

Re: [Rd] problem building R-patched on x86-64 with PGI 6.1

2006-03-11 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Liaw, Andy wrote: > Dear R-devel, > > [I'm not sure if this is appropriate for R-devel. If not, I'm more than > happy to move it to R-help.] It is certainly not appropriate to R-help: see the posting guide. > As those of you who saw my post on R-help know, I've been trying