Dear testers,
We plan to release version 2.2.1 on December 20. Beta tarballs will
be available daily, starting tomorrow.
As usual, we strongly prefer to hear about bugs before release rather
than after.
-pd
--
O__ Peter Dalgaard Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
c/ /'
>
> Using the biased variance just because it is the MLE (if that is the
> argument) seems confused to me. However, there's another point:
>
>> var(sample(1:3, 10, replace=TRUE))
> [1] 0.6680556
>
> i.e. if we are considering x as the entire population, then the
> variance when sampling from it
Hi
ivo welch wrote:
> I am stumbling into external font issues here and there. I presume using
> external lucida fonts is fairly rare, so I am more likely to stumble onto
> issues here. (of course, I often think I have stumbled onto bugs/features
> that are not.) So, I hope I am not imposing b
On 05-Dec-05 Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> The variance of X is (or damn well should be) defined as
>>
>> Var(X) = E(X^2) - (E(X))^2
>>
>> and this comes to (Sum(X^2) - (Sum(X)/N)^2))/(N-1).
>
> I don't follow this. I agree with the first line (though I prefer to
> write it differently), but I do
On 12/5/2005 2:25 PM, (Ted Harding) wrote:
> On 05-Dec-05 Martin Maechler wrote:
>> UweL> x <- c(1,2,3,4,5)
>> UweL> n <- length(x)
>> UweL> var(x)*(n-1)/n
>>
>> UweL> if you really want it.
>>
>> It seems Insightful at some point in time have given in to
>> this user request, and
Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems Insightful at some point in time have given in to
> this user request, and S-plus nowadays has
> an argument "unbiased = TRUE"
> where the user can choose {to shoot (him/her)self in the leg and}
> require 'unbiased = FALSE'.
> {and there's al
On 05-Dec-05 Martin Maechler wrote:
> UweL> x <- c(1,2,3,4,5)
> UweL> n <- length(x)
> UweL> var(x)*(n-1)/n
>
> UweL> if you really want it.
>
> It seems Insightful at some point in time have given in to
> this user request, and S-plus nowadays has
> an argument "unbiased = TRUE"
{from R-help, diverted to R-devel}:
UweL> Wang Tian Hua wrote:
UweL> hi, when i was computing the variance of a simple
UweL> vector, i found unexpect result. not sure whether it
UweL> is a bug.
UweL> Not a bug! ?var:
UweL> "The denominator n - 1 is used which gives an un
Hi,
I have some Problems compiling/linking R under AIX 4.3
Here what kind of compilers I use:
$ /usr/local/bin/gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.2.0/3.4.3/specs
Configured with: ../gcc-3.4.3/configure --disable-nls --disable-aix64
Thread model: aix
gcc version 3.4.3
actually, I can confirm now that gs AFPL 8.53 is the "culprit" here on #2,
copied below again (though it is not a bug but a feature, albeit one you
need to know about.) the -dSAFER switch, which appears in later versions of
AFPL gs, not only eliminates renamefile and deletefile (manpage), but
see
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Philip Lijnzaad wrote:
> On Friday 02 December 2005 18:20, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
>> What shells are these?
>
> Bash, mostly, but also ksh and zsh; sorry for not mentioning this.
I still don't know what you did to be able to reproduce this (and I did
ask). And as it is a
On Friday 02 December 2005 18:20, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> What shells are these?
Bash, mostly, but also ksh and zsh; sorry for not mentioning this. I now see
that the root account usually does not change the behaviour of cd, so we may
as well forget about the matter. My thought was: if a s
12 matches
Mail list logo
