Re: [Rd] Principal Components Analysis (PR#8320)

2005-11-16 Thread ripley
Please do RTFM: ?princomp says Note: The signs of the columns of the loadings and scores are arbitrary, and so may differ between different programs for PCA, and even between different builds of R. and ?prcomp has a similar comment. Equally, the signs of eigenvectors are arb

[Rd] Principal Components Analysis (PR#8320)

2005-11-16 Thread sarkar
Full_Name: Sahotra Sarkar Version: 2.2.0 OS: Windows XP Professional Submission from: (NULL) (146.6.130.180) The following two commands should give the same results for the eigenvectors but do not (there is a sign reversal for the first one): > summary(princomp(bumpus),loading = TRUE) Importance

Re: [Rd] two-way communication using Unix pipes

2005-11-16 Thread Paul Roebuck
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Jonathan Callahan wrote: > I am trying to communicate with R from a perl program. Because this code > must be deployed on systems that are outside of my control I do not wish to > pursue the RSperl.pm approach which requires that R be compiled to use > shared libraries. > > I

[Rd] Newsletter Evolution Travel

2005-11-16 Thread Evolution Travel
Ciao, abbiamo ricevuto la tua richiesta d'iscrizione alla newsletter di Evolution Travel. Per CONFERMARE l'iscrizione alla newsletter clicca qui: http://www.vacanzeviaggi.net/cgi-bin/arp3/arp3-confirm.pl?p=1132161700.343352 Se invece non hai fatto tu questa richiesta oppure non vuoi essere iscr

Re: [Rd] two-way communication using Unix pipes

2005-11-16 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Barry Rowlingson wrote: > Jonathan Callahan wrote: > >> Can someone please explain to me exactly what R is doing with the the >> standard IO handles and whether or not there is any simple way to convince >> it to behave as if it were talking to a user at the other end of a key

Re: [Rd] Problem with R.2.2 "No rule to make target `d:/prog/r/rw2011/include/R.h"

2005-11-16 Thread Witold Eryk Wolski
Thats it. Thanks a lot, Eryk Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Witold Eryk Wolski wrote: > >> Dear R-devlopers, >> >> I removed yesterday the R.2.1. installation from windows NT laptop and I >> am getting the following error when building a pacage with R.2.2 >> >> -- Making

Re: [Rd] PPC package-ppc.read.raw.nobatch (PR#8316)

2005-11-16 Thread ligges
martin.o'[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name: Martin O'Gorman > Version: > OS: > Submission from: (NULL) (84.176.63.149) > > > I have been looking at the PPC package and have a question. As the input data > is > comma separated, shouldn’t the command to read in the raw (no batch) mass spec >

Re: [Rd] Problem with R.2.2 "No rule to make target `d:/prog/r/rw2011/include/R.h"

2005-11-16 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Witold Eryk Wolski wrote: > Dear R-devlopers, > > I removed yesterday the R.2.1. installation from windows NT laptop and I > am getting the following error when building a pacage with R.2.2 > > -- Making package msbase > adding build stamp to DESCRIPTION

Re: [Rd] two-way communication using Unix pipes

2005-11-16 Thread Barry Rowlingson
Jonathan Callahan wrote: > Can someone please explain to me exactly what R is doing with the the > standard IO handles and whether or not there is any simple way to convince > it to behave as if it were talking to a user at the other end of a keyboard > and terminal? I've already tried '--no-readl

[Rd] Problem with R.2.2 "No rule to make target `d:/prog/r/rw2011/include/R.h"

2005-11-16 Thread Witold Eryk Wolski
Dear R-devlopers, I removed yesterday the R.2.1. installation from windows NT laptop and I am getting the following error when building a pacage with R.2.2 -- Making package msbase adding build stamp to DESCRIPTION making DLL ... make[3]: *** No rule to make target `d:

[Rd] two-way communication using Unix pipes

2005-11-16 Thread Jonathan Callahan
Hello, I am trying to communicate with R from a perl program. Because this code must be deployed on systems that are outside of my control I do not wish to pursue the RSperl.pm approach which requires that R be compiled to use shared libraries. I have a custom, light weight module I have used wit

[Rd] PPC package-ppc.read.raw.nobatch (PR#8316)

2005-11-16 Thread martin . o'gorman
Full_Name: Martin O'Gorman Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (84.176.63.149) I have been looking at the PPC package and have a question. As the input data is comma separated, shouldn’t the command to read in the raw (no batch) mass spec data indicate that sep=”,” (marked below) ? Otherwise,

Re: [Rd] Malformed package name (PR#8314)

2005-11-16 Thread ripley
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --27464147-1563048805-1132142703=:11543 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On

Re: [Rd] Malformed package name (PR#8314)

2005-11-16 Thread maechler
> "petrakl" == petrakl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:10:46 +0100 (CET) writes: petrakl> Full_Name: L. Petrák petrakl> Version: 2.2 petrakl> OS: w2k petrakl> Submission from: (NULL) (193.109.177.11) petrakl> # rcmd build Translation-it petrakl>

Re: [Rd] Malformed package name (PR#8314)

2005-11-16 Thread Peter Dalgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Full_Name: L. Petrák > Version: 2.2 > OS: w2k > Submission from: (NULL) (193.109.177.11) > > > # rcmd build Translation-it > * checking for file 'Translation-it/DESCRIPTION' ... OK > * preparing 'Translation-it': > * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... ERROR > M

[Rd] Malformed package name (PR#8314)

2005-11-16 Thread petrakl
Full_Name: L. Petrák Version: 2.2 OS: w2k Submission from: (NULL) (193.109.177.11) # rcmd build Translation-it * checking for file 'Translation-it/DESCRIPTION' ... OK * preparing 'Translation-it': * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... ERROR Malformed package name See the information on DES

Re: [Rd] Package manpage DCF hooks

2005-11-16 Thread Martin Maechler
> "Paul" == Paul Roebuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:07:47 -0600 (CST) writes: Paul> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Martin Maechler wrote: >> > "Paul" == Paul Roebuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > on Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:57:04 -0600 (CST) writes: >> Pa

Re: [Rd] Bug or a feature that I completely missed?

2005-11-16 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Berwin A Turlach wrote: > Dear all, > > while looking at some R-code submitted by students in a unit that I > teach, I came across constructs that I thought would lead to an error. > Much to my surprise, the code is actually executed. > > A boiled down version of the code is t