There is a considerable difference: model.response is documented to work
on a model frame. Why does model.response(model.frame(object))) not work
in the generality you need?
Please give us some examples of why you are trying to do, and how you
would envisage a generic model.response being docu
Dear R contributors,
Gary King, Olivia Lau (both at Harvard) and I are working on an R
package where we are trying to write functions equivalent to
model.frame(), model.matrix(), and model.response() for multiple equations
models (i.e., models that require the specification of multiple formulae)
If the default were changed to VECTORIZED=FALSE then it would
still be functionally compatible with what we have now so all existing
software would continue to run correctly yet would not cause
problems for the unwary. Existing software would not have to be changed
to add VECTORIZED=TRUE except fo
[following on from a thread on R-help, but my post here seems more
appropriate to R-devel]
Would a patch to make outer() work with non-vectorized functions be
considered? It seems to come up moderately often on the list, which
probably indicates that many many people get bitten by the same
incor
Thanks, easy to correct. We will explicitly say that a factor 'x' is
erroneous.
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Marc Schwartz (via MN) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Came across an error in ?strsplit in the details section:
>
> Details:
>
> Arguments 'x' and 'split' will be coerced to character, so you
> wi
Hi all,
Came across an error in ?strsplit in the details section:
Details:
Arguments 'x' and 'split' will be coerced to character, so you
will see uses with 'split = NULL' to mean 'split = character(0)',
including in the examples below.
I caught myself trying to use strsplit() o
Full_Name: Ian McLeod
Version: 2.10
OS: windows
Submission from: (NULL) (129.100.76.136)
Subject: Apparent bug in optim with "L-BFGS-B".
I found that optim works most of the time but sometimes produced an incorrect
answer. In order to document what is happening, I tried to simplify by
re-wr
