Re: [Rd] error compiling R-code

2005-10-10 Thread Duncan Murdoch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I have been compiling R from source code with regularity (both R-patched > and R-devel) for several months now. About two/three weeks ago I noticed a > compilation error in R-devel (see below). I thought that the error will go > away in "due course" so I did no

Re: [Rd] bug loading libraries with winXP and 2.2.0 but not 2.1.1 (PR#8201)

2005-10-10 Thread rgentlem
Hi, thanks for the report - but it should have gone to the Bioconductor list, and the package maintainer, thanks. New versions of multtest and a few other packages will percolate up in the next few days to resolve the problem. Best wishes, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name

Re: [Rd] bug loading libraries with winXP and 2.2.0 but not 2.1.1 (PR#8200)

2005-10-10 Thread Robert Gentleman
Hi, thanks for the report - but it should have gone to the Bioconductor list, and the package maintainer, thanks. New versions of multtest and a few other packages will percolate up in the next few days to resolve the problem. Best wishes, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name

[Rd] error compiling R-code

2005-10-10 Thread apjaworski
Hi, I have been compiling R from source code with regularity (both R-patched and R-devel) for several months now. About two/three weeks ago I noticed a compilation error in R-devel (see below). I thought that the error will go away in "due course" so I did not investigate it further. Then I lef

Re: [Rd] 'R CMD check' gets apparently confused by '%' (PR#8198)

2005-10-10 Thread Kurt Hornik
> lgautier writes: > Full_Name: Laurent > Version: R-2.0.0-beta-from-a-week-ago > OS: linux > Submission from: (NULL) (202.156.6.77) > When running 'R CMD check' for a package that contains the symbol '%' > in the signature of a function (say the default parameter for a string > argument is

[Rd] bug loading libraries with winXP and 2.2.0 but not 2.1.1 (PR#8200)

2005-10-10 Thread kompass
Full_Name: Ken Kompass Version: 2.2.0 OS: winXP pro (2002 version, SP2) Submission from: (NULL) (128.252.149.244) Using R2.2.0 I get this error msg when loading certain bioconductor libraries (depending on whether the library contains file named "all.rda" in R folder of library) : > library(mult

[Rd] Documenting newly created generic versions of non-generic base R functions

2005-10-10 Thread Gavin Simpson
Hi, Following the Writing R Extensions manual, I created a method for the cor function. As cor is not a generic, I followed the advice of section 6.1 of the same manual and did the following: cor <- function(x, ...) UseMethod("cor") cor.default <- stats::cor cor.symcoca <- function{ some code }

Re: [Rd] using innov in arima.sim

2005-10-10 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Hjellvik Vidar wrote: > Hello, > > I have used the arima.sim function to generate a lot of time series, but to > day I got som results that I didn't quite understand. Generating two time > series z0 and z1 as > > eps <- rnorm(n, sd=0.03) > z0 <- arima.sim(list(ar=c(0.9)), n=

[Rd] using innov in arima.sim

2005-10-10 Thread Hjellvik Vidar
Hello, I have used the arima.sim function to generate a lot of time series, but to day I got som results that I didn't quite understand. Generating two time series z0 and z1 as eps <- rnorm(n, sd=0.03) z0 <- arima.sim(list(ar=c(0.9)), n=n, innov=eps) and z1 <- arima.sim(list(ar=c(0.9)), n=n,

Re: [Rd] Catching warning and error output

2005-10-10 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
> What I would like to have: > Of course there would be many different ways to accomplish this. Here are > some solutions I can think of: I just had an additional idea: 4) Export inError, and inWarning from errors.c: I'm not entirely sure this would really work as expected, but if it did, it woul

[Rd] Catching warning and error output

2005-10-10 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi all, I'm working on a GUI frontend for R, and I'm looking for a good way to catch all warning- and error-output. The reason for this is mostly, that I would like to know, which sections of the output are "normal" output, warnings, and errors. This would allow for some nice features, such as

[Rd] 'R CMD check' gets apparently confused by '%' (PR#8198)

2005-10-10 Thread lgautier
Full_Name: Laurent Version: R-2.0.0-beta-from-a-week-ago OS: linux Submission from: (NULL) (202.156.6.77) When running 'R CMD check' for a package that contains the symbol '%' in the signature of a function (say the default parameter for a string argument is like "10% - 20%"), the 'codoc' part of