On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Joel Bremson wrote:
> I'm not looking for an answer here, this is just a report of a
> peculiar event I've observed
> and can reproduce.
>
> I'm developing a g95 (20050129) compiled package on windows xp pro
> using R-2.1.1, and gcc-3.4.2 (mingw special). An older version of
I'm not looking for an answer here, this is just a report of a
peculiar event I've observed
and can reproduce.
I'm developing a g95 (20050129) compiled package on windows xp pro
using R-2.1.1, and gcc-3.4.2 (mingw special). An older version of the
F95 package compiled and ran without problems. The
On 10/7/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> > On 10/7/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> >>
> >>>Is there some way of automatically including the svn version number
> >>>of a package in the DESCRIPTION file or ot
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Jennifer Lai wrote:
>Is FFT implemented in R takes advantage of multi-processors?
> I ran this benchmark from from http://www.sciviews.org, and AMD Opteron
> 2.2 GHz performs better than AMD Opteron 1.8 GHz on all test cases,
> except FFT operation.
> Both machines run same
