Full_Name: Ken Kelley
Version: 2.1.1
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (156.56.79.54)
A warning from optim() when reltol was specified for the L-BFGS-B method:
"method L-BFGS-B uses 'fact' (and 'pgtol') instead of 'reltol' and 'abstol' in:
optim(par = LL.0, fn = Low.Lim.NC.F, gr = NULL, m
Hi,
Is FFT implemented in R takes advantage of multi-processors?
I ran this benchmark from from http://www.sciviews.org, and AMD Opteron
2.2 GHz performs better than AMD Opteron 1.8 GHz on all test cases,
except FFT operation.
Both machines run same OSs (RedHat WS 3) and 2.2 GHz has more memo
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On 10/7/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>
>>>Is there some way of automatically including the svn version number
>>>of a package in the DESCRIPTION file or otherwise so that one
>>>can check from within R which svn version nu
Jens,
This is a completely separate issue. In indexing, character NA matches
the name "NA". That was a bug, but it is nothing to do with the subject
line or PR#8161, and for the record let's keep this separate. The
`critical point' is not to build a theory around misunderstandings of
sever
On 7 Oct 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 10/7/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>> Is there some way of automatically including the svn version
>>> number of a package in the DESCRIPTION file or otherwise so that
>>> one can check from within R which
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
I haven't been following this conversation in order, but I think there's
another bug here besides the one(s?) you identified:
Jens had this example:
x <- 1:4
names(x) <- c(NA, "NA", "a", "")
x[names(x)]
a
113 NA
Shouldn't the seco
On 10/7/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> > Is there some way of automatically including the svn version number
> > of a package in the DESCRIPTION file or otherwise so that one
> > can check from within R which svn version number one has?
>
> You could do
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> Is there some way of automatically including the svn version number
> of a package in the DESCRIPTION file or otherwise so that one
> can check from within R which svn version number one has?
You could do this by writing it into your Makefile, but there's no other
exis
Peter Kleiweg wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley schreef op de 7e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005:
>
>
>>On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Duncan Murdoch schreef op de 6e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005:
>>>
>>>
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
>Wha
I haven't been following this conversation in order, but I think there's
another bug here besides the one(s?) you identified:
Jens had this example:
> x <- 1:4
> names(x) <- c(NA, "NA", "a", "")
> x[names(x)]
a
113 NA
Shouldn't the second entry in the result be 2, with na
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley schreef op de 7e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005:
>
>> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
>>
>>> Duncan Murdoch schreef op de 6e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005:
>>>
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley schreef op de 7e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
>
> > Duncan Murdoch schreef op de 6e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005:
> >
> > > On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
> > >
> > > > What has changed in R for Windows
Hi Do you
d less On
tions?
want to spen
your Meddica
It's Very easy! - Get more information
CiaXanViaAmValiLev
liagbuit
s $1xra $ienm $ra
21 3.33 3.75
And more than 200 other , Have a nice day
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-devel@r-p
Just want to clarify that it is the package itself that is being developed
under svn; I was not referring to the svn version number of R.
On 10/7/05, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there some way of automatically including the svn version number
> of a package in the DESCRIPTIO
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
>
> I did a standard install of R 2.2.0 on Linux. When I run
> help.start(), I get an intro page that has a broken link to a
> stylesheet. The same for the pages "Packages", "Search Engine &
> Keywords", "About R", and "Resources". The other help pages do
>
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
> Duncan Murdoch schreef op de 6e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005:
>
>> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> What has changed in R for Windows from version 1.7.1 to
>>> 2.2.0 that won't allow me to build binary packages?
>>
>> Many thi
I did a standard install of R 2.2.0 on Linux. When I run
help.start(), I get an intro page that has a broken link to a
stylesheet. The same for the pages "Packages", "Search Engine &
Keywords", "About R", and "Resources". The other help pages do
have a correct link to the stylesheet.
--
Pete
Is there some way of automatically including the svn version number
of a package in the DESCRIPTION file or otherwise so that one
can check from within R which svn version number one has?
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman
Duncan Murdoch schreef op de 6e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2005:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
>
> >
> > What has changed in R for Windows from version 1.7.1 to
> > 2.2.0 that won't allow me to build binary packages?
>
> Many things have changed; I don't know which is causin
Full_Name: AJ Rossini
Version: 2.2.0
OS: Unix
Submission from: (NULL) (160.62.4.10)
new.packages() reports on packages which are installed as well as not installed,
for packages installed using install.packages() and the argument
installWithVers=TRUE
This contrasts with reporting only on uninsta
Dear Brian,
Thanks for picking this up.
I think the critical point is that it is not a single isolated bug and it
would be a main effort to get this stuff consistent, because it (and
implications) seems to be spread all over the code. The to be applauded
efforts to properly sort out "NA" vs. as.c
21 matches
Mail list logo
