Re: [Rd] looks in liblapack.a not liblapack.so

2005-09-22 Thread Luke Tierney
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Charles Geyer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:43:51PM -0500, Luke Tierney wrote: >> On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Charles Geyer wrote: >>> >>> I still don't understand why gcc -shared even bothers to look in *.a >>> (on AMD64) when it won't do the slightest bit of good. Maybe I'm

Re: [Rd] Wishlist - access non-text from clipboard in Windows

2005-09-22 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On 9/22/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/22/2005 2:50 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > On 9/22/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 9/22/2005 1:12 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > >> > There is an open source clipboard extender CLCL that handles all > >> > clipb

Re: [Rd] Wishlist - access non-text from clipboard in Windows

2005-09-22 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 9/22/2005 2:50 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > On 9/22/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 9/22/2005 1:12 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: >> > There is an open source clipboard extender CLCL that handles all >> > clipboard formats. I think this code could be leveraged to simplify

Re: [Rd] Wishlist - access non-text from clipboard in Windows

2005-09-22 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On 9/22/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/22/2005 1:12 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > There is an open source clipboard extender CLCL that handles all > > clipboard formats. I think this code could be leveraged to simplify > > it substantially. Run CLCL and copy something fr

Re: [Rd] looks in liblapack.a not liblapack.so

2005-09-22 Thread Charles Geyer
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:43:51PM -0500, Luke Tierney wrote: > On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Charles Geyer wrote: > > > >I still don't understand why gcc -shared even bothers to look in *.a > >(on AMD64) when it won't do the slightest bit of good. Maybe I'm still > >ignorant of some important technical is

Re: [Rd] Wishlist - access non-text from clipboard in Windows

2005-09-22 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 9/22/2005 1:12 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > There is an open source clipboard extender CLCL that handles all > clipboard formats. I think this code could be leveraged to simplify > it substantially. Run CLCL and copy something from IE or Excel, > say, so that you have a complex object in th

Re: [Rd] Wishlist - access non-text from clipboard in Windows

2005-09-22 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
There is an open source clipboard extender CLCL that handles all clipboard formats. I think this code could be leveraged to simplify it substantially. Run CLCL and copy something from IE or Excel, say, so that you have a complex object in the clipboard. Now expand Clipboard in the left pane and t

Re: [Rd] Wishlist - access non-text from clipboard in Windows

2005-09-22 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 9/22/2005 11:13 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > Just wanted to post this wishlist item. > > Currently one can read text from the Windows clipboard but the Windows > clipboard can hold all sorts of objects, not just text, and it can > hold them simultaneously. For example, if one selects some c

[Rd] Wishlist - access non-text from clipboard in Windows

2005-09-22 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
Just wanted to post this wishlist item. Currently one can read text from the Windows clipboard but the Windows clipboard can hold all sorts of objects, not just text, and it can hold them simultaneously. For example, if one selects some cells in Excel and then copies them to the clipboard, the cl

Re: [Rd] as.data.frame segfaults on large lists (PR#8141)

2005-09-22 Thread tlumley
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1903393524-2062424977-1127399140=:32170 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE

Re: [Rd] looks in liblapack.a not liblapack.so

2005-09-22 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Which confirms the wisdom of our advice not to use --with-lapack > unless you have to (a few systems do). (Quote from the R-admin manual > > this is definitely *not* recommended > > . Perhaps this needs to say `use at your own risk and do no

Re: [Rd] looks in liblapack.a not liblapack.so

2005-09-22 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > running code in 'base-Ex.R' ...make[4]: *** [base-Ex.Rout] Error 1 > make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/pd/r-devel/BUILD/tests/Examples' > make[3]: *** [test-Examples-Base] Error 2 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] BUILD]$ tail tests/Examples/base-Ex.Rout.fail

Re: [Rd] looks in liblapack.a not liblapack.so

2005-09-22 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Which confirms the wisdom of our advice not to use --with-lapack unless you have to (a few systems do). (Quote from the R-admin manual this is definitely *not* recommended . Perhaps this needs to say `use at your own risk and do not report problems with it'!) There are far too many

Re: [Rd] looks in liblapack.a not liblapack.so

2005-09-22 Thread Peter Dalgaard
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Martyn Plummer wrote: > > > Fedora have just split off a separate lapack-devel package containing > > the static library and the symlink liblapack.so. (Mandrake/Mandriva has > > been doing this for some time. I don't know about SuSE). The up2date > > ser