[Rd] as.Date() , feature or bug?

2005-09-13 Thread Bo Peng
Under linux and windows, > as.Date("-06-06") [1] "-06-06" > as.Date("-07-07") [1] "1970-01-01" > Feature? Bug? help(as.Date) does not mention this case. Bo. __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-dev

Re: [Rd] plot(): new behavior in R-2.2.0 alpha

2005-09-13 Thread John Fox
Dear Martin, A couple of comments on the new plots (numbers 5 and 6): Perhaps some more thought could be given to the plotted contours for Cook's D (which are 0.5 and 1.0 in the example -- large Cook's Ds). A rule-of-thumb cut-off for this example is 4/(n - p) = 4/(50 - 5) = 0.089, and the discrep

Re: [Rd] possible bug in model.matrix

2005-09-13 Thread Peter Dalgaard
"Whit Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is this a bug, or have I misunderstood the proper use of lm? Dunno. It appears that logicals like factors are not supposed to have matrix structure. What actually happens is that setting contrasts strips dimension attributes Browse[1]> debug: for (

[Rd] possible bug in model.matrix

2005-09-13 Thread Whit Armstrong
Is this a bug, or have I misunderstood the proper use of lm? Thanks, Whit code: x <- rnorm(50) y <- matrix(as.logical(round(runif(100),0)),ncol=2) NROW(x)==NROW(y) lm(x~y) > x <- rnorm(50) > y <- matrix(as.logical(round(runif(100),0)),ncol=2) > NROW(x)==NROW(y) [1] TRUE > lm(x~y) Error in "[[

Re: [Rd] NUMERIC_POINTER question

2005-09-13 Thread Huntsinger, Reid
You have to coerce to numeric yourself if that's what you want. Eg in the R code, as.numeric(1:12) rather than 1:12. Or check the type first in C with TYPEOF before doing NUMERIC_POINTER or INTEGER_POINTER (the difference is that the two do different casts; they both point a fixed offset into the R

Re: [Rd] NUMERIC_POINTER question

2005-09-13 Thread Simon Urbanek
Eryk, On Sep 13, 2005, at 2:26 PM, nwew wrote: > printf("%f\n",NUMERIC_POINTER(mat)[1]); > [...] > However it prints > 0. > if [EMAIL PROTECTED] are integers ( [EMAIL PROTECTED]<-matrix(1:12,3,4) ). > > Can anyone explain it to me why? > I thought that NUMERIC_POINTER makes it clear that i ex

Re: [Rd] NUMERIC_POINTER question

2005-09-13 Thread Roger Bivand
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, nwew wrote: > Dear R-developers, > > Using .Call I pass a S4 class with e.g. the following class definition: > > setClass("mmatrix",representation( >data="matrix") > ) > > On the "C side" i do > mat = GET_SLOT(vs,install("data")); > and then: > printf("%f\n",NUMERIC_POI

Re: [Rd] Copying libraries from one version of R to another (was Re: MikTeX will be assumed in R 2.2.0 in Windows)

2005-09-13 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 9/13/2005 1:55 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > Thanks. That's great. If I understand correctly, versions that > are as of the one you just uploaded will have this facility and for older > versions I need to search in the old, existing, way. Thus once 2.3, say, > comes out we will have 2.2. and

[Rd] NUMERIC_POINTER question

2005-09-13 Thread nwew
Dear R-developers, Using .Call I pass a S4 class with e.g. the following class definition: setClass("mmatrix",representation( data="matrix") ) On the "C side" i do mat = GET_SLOT(vs,install("data")); and then: printf("%f\n",NUMERIC_POINTER(mat)[1]); The above print statement produces the co

Re: [Rd] Copying libraries from one version of R to another (was Re: MikTeX will be assumed in R 2.2.0 in Windows)

2005-09-13 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
Thanks. That's great. If I understand correctly, versions that are as of the one you just uploaded will have this facility and for older versions I need to search in the old, existing, way. Thus once 2.3, say, comes out we will have 2.2. and 2.3 in the registry. That means that as of 2.3 it will

Re: [Rd] Copying libraries from one version of R to another (was Re: MikTeX will be assumed in R 2.2.0 in Windows)

2005-09-13 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 9/9/2005 10:11 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > On 9/9/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've just committed some changes to allow R to be built and to use >> MikTeX without needing the Rd.sty files to be installed to localtexmf. >> Unfortunately, the changes are not compatible wit

[Rd] plot(): new behavior in R-2.2.0 alpha

2005-09-13 Thread Martin Maechler
As some of you R-devel readers may know, the plot() method for "lm" objects is based in large parts on contributions by John Maindonald, subsequently "massaged" by me and other R-core members. In the statistics litterature on applied regression, people have had diverse oppinions on what (and how