Hi all,
I noted that the books below are not included on the R web site
Documentation section under "Books". I thought that I would provide
these and have created some bib entries consistent with the style used
on the site. The abstract sections were copied from the publisher sites.
I hope that t
We've never encountered this lying mirror problem. Perhaps you (or
another user of the unreliable mirror) could contribute suitable fixes.
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Berwin A Turlach wrote:
> G'day Brian,
>
> I am splitting my reply to your e-mail into two since there are two
> separate spinoffs.
>
>
> It cannot be .Call: your .Call passed no parameters so there was nothing
> to be uninitialized. I did ask you why you were doing that.
This .Call without parameters is just for a test. I am constructing an
interface to this C/Fortran optimization package, and because this
segmentation fault pr
Berwin A Turlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is, that the code produced by f2c is decrementing pointers
> to simulate 1-based vectors and the C FAQ is pretty unambigious about
> the fact that this provokes undefined behaviour, see
> http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q6.17.html
Full_Name: Göran Broström
Version: R-2.1.1, 2.2.0
OS: Debian unstable
Submission from: (NULL) (213.65.9.59)
Some BLAS routines call xerbla for error messages, which results in a message
like
"LAPACK routine DGER gave error code -9".
Suggested solution: In
void F77_NAME(xerbla)(char *srname, in
G'day Brian,
> "BDR" == Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BDR> As for the problem, yes it probably is a bug in L-BFGS-B.
BDR> Fancy debugging the code?
I was afraid that somebody would ask this. ;-)
I looked a bit at the code and it seems to be non-trivial. Moreover,
it
G'day Brian,
I am splitting my reply to your e-mail into two since there are two
separate spinoffs.
> "BDR" == Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BDR> Check your versions of MASS. The Windows one appears to be
BDR> an outdated version, and does different things.
Thanks, y
