>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Gordon Smyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: R 2.1.1: read.table processes C-style escapes
>Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:51:45 +1000
>
>In R 2.1.1, the default behaviour of scan() was changed to process all
>C-style escapes, even when a delimiter was specified using the '
In R 2.1.1, the default behaviour of scan() was changed to process all
C-style escapes, even when a delimiter was specified using the 'sep'
argument. A new argument 'allowEscapes' was introduced to turn this
processing off.
Because read.table() calls scan(), read.table() inherits the new defaul
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Paul Roebuck wrote:
> What exactly is a reference object? I'm getting this error
> message attempting to register a finalizer:
>
> can only weakly reference/finalize reference objects
Still don't have an explanation for the above but the code
now works with the follow
What exactly is a reference object? I'm getting this error
message attempting to register a finalizer:
can only weakly reference/finalize reference objects
I don't see any problem with the code... Here's what appears
to be the relevant portions.
setClass("PDNNObject",
represent
Hi,
I guess this is a final plea, and maybe this should go to R-help but
here goes.
I am writing a set of functions for calibration and prediction, and to
calculate standard
errors and intervals I need the variance function to be evaluated at new
prediction points.
So for instance
fit<-gnls(Y~SSl
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Kjetil Brinchmann Halvorsen wrote:
> This is R2.1.1
>
> The documantation opened by
> ?ar, section for returned value, does not document all the components of
> the returned
> list. In addition to the 13 components documented, it also contains the
> component
> $frequency
> Th
This is R2.1.1
The documantation opened by
?ar, section for returned value, does not document all the components of
the returned
list. In addition to the 13 components documented, it also contains the
component
$frequency
This also applies to the help page opened by
?ar.ols
--
Kjetil Halvorse
Well,
you say yourself it wasn't reproducible. So it could have been
anything that "crashed" you R , cosmic radiation, a bolt of
lightning reversing a bit in your computer memory ,... :-)
many things rather than a bug in R.
But before dropping this report completely,
can you try
for(i in 1:1000
The underlying problem here BTW is that sum is promoting logical to double
not integer, unlike the rest of its Summary group. This is an
unintentional side effect of a bug fix a while back, and I have now
corrected it.
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Michael Beer
> V
