[Rd] Ambiguous address warning

2005-06-17 Thread MMDF
Mail addressed to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" was ambiguous, but was delivered to John_G_Dorsey (john) The name "john" also matched the following users Full name (login name) Andrew_John (aj14) Bonnie_John (bej) To avoid this warning message in the future, add

[Rd] loess returns different standard errors for identical models (PR#7956)

2005-06-17 Thread btyner
Full_Name: Benjamin Tyner Version: 2.1.0, 4/18/2005 OS: i686-redhat-linux-gnu Submission from: (NULL) (4.64.8.220) # Just run my.test() below in a newly opened R session. Once too many models have been fit (~20 on my system), the computed standard error jumps to a different value. This is (superf

Re: [Rd] R Include File Guards

2005-06-17 Thread Paul Roebuck
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Paul Roebuck wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 May 2005, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > > > >> Paul Roebuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >>> R 2.1.0/src/include from 2005/04/18 download > >>> > >>> Naming inconsistent for guards as well but

Re: [Rd] (PR#7951) DispatchOrEval missing in do_isfinite and do_isinfinite

2005-06-17 Thread lars
Hi, OK, if you try to explicitly make them generic, you are told that they are implicitly already generic: > setGeneric("is.finite", function(from, ...) standardGeneric("is.finite")) Error in setGeneric("is.finite", function(from, ...) standardGeneric("is.finite")) : "is.finite" is a primi

Re: [Rd] hist.default documentation

2005-06-17 Thread Duncan Murdoch
Thanks, I've committed the change. Duncan Murdoch On 6/17/2005 10:30 AM, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: > On 6/17/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 6/17/2005 8:58 AM, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: >> > I think there are a couple of things in ?hist that are not quite as >> > clear as they could

Re: [Rd] hist.default documentation

2005-06-17 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On 6/17/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/17/2005 8:58 AM, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: > > I think there are a couple of things in ?hist that are not quite as > > clear as they could be. > > > > (1) > > > > freq: logical; if 'TRUE', the histogram graphic is a representation > >

Re: [Rd] hist.default documentation

2005-06-17 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 6/17/2005 8:58 AM, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: > I think there are a couple of things in ?hist that are not quite as > clear as they could be. > > (1) > > freq: logical; if 'TRUE', the histogram graphic is a representation > of frequencies, the 'counts' component of the result; if >

[Rd] hist.default documentation

2005-06-17 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
I think there are a couple of things in ?hist that are not quite as clear as they could be. (1) freq: logical; if 'TRUE', the histogram graphic is a representation of frequencies, the 'counts' component of the result; if 'FALSE', _relative_ frequencies ("probabilities"),

Re: [Rd] R Include File Guards

2005-06-17 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
What is the `bug' here which you suggest reporting? We have already established that leading underscores are NOT `illegal', just reserved and possibly ineffective according to the C99 standard (although we don't have any evidence of that being followed by an actual compiler). Given that the sys