Re: [Rd] R 2.1.1 slated for June 20

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > Question: I just downloaded the daily Windows build of "R-devel" and it > claims to be a pre-release of R 2.2.0. So ... is the next release 2.1.1 > or 2.2.0? Or is there just not a readily-available Windows build of 2.1.1? R-devel is the development version for R-2.

Re: [Rd] R 2.1.1 slated for June 20

Question: I just downloaded the daily Windows build of "R-devel" and it claims to be a pre-release of R 2.2.0. So ... is the next release 2.1.1 or 2.2.0? Or is there just not a readily-available Windows build of 2.1.1? Peter Dalgaard wrote: >The next version of R will be released (barring force m

Re: [Rd] Citation for R

Gordon K Smyth wrote: >This is just a note that R would get a lot more citations if the recommended >citation was an >article in a recognised journal or from a recognised publisher. > >I use R in work leading to publications often, and I strongly want to give the >R core team credit >for their

Re: [Rd] Citation for R

There is one easy way to do this. Make R-core the guest editor of a special issue of JSS and use that special issue to publish the manuals (which again have R-core as author). On Jun 12, 2005, at 17:37 , Gordon K Smyth wrote: > This is just a note that R would get a lot more citations if the

[Rd] Citation for R

This is just a note that R would get a lot more citations if the recommended citation was an article in a recognised journal or from a recognised publisher. I use R in work leading to publications often, and I strongly want to give the R core team credit for their work. However I find that I ca

Re: [Rd] alloca() on FreeBSD (PR#7890)

Prof. Ripley: I apologize for my lack of response. I just moved halfway across the US and have had little to no connectivity for the past two weeks. :( Thanks to you and Rainer Hurling for fixing this. Eric Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Full_Na

Re: [Rd] by should use match.fun

Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 6/12/05, Simon Urbanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Umm.. why don't you just use > > > > by(iris, row.names(iris), `(`) > > > > In general I consider passing functions as text unnecessary - the > > only use I could think of is constructi

Re: [Rd] by should use match.fun

On 6/12/05, Simon Urbanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jun 12, 2005, at 3:21 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > > On 6/12/05, Liaw, Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I don't get the point. ?by says: > >> > > > > The point is that all other functions of this sort including apply, > > sapp

Re: [Rd] by should use match.fun

On Jun 12, 2005, at 3:21 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > On 6/12/05, Liaw, Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I don't get the point. ?by says: >> > > The point is that all other functions of this sort including apply, > sapply, > tapply, lapply work like that so 'by' ought to as well. > > Her

Re: [Rd] by should use match.fun

On 6/12/05, Liaw, Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't get the point. ?by says: The point is that all other functions of this sort including apply, sapply, tapply, lapply work like that so 'by' ought to as well. Here is the example (changed to use iris) where I noticed it. Suppose we wa

Re: [Rd] by should use match.fun

I don't get the point. ?by says: FUN a function to be applied to data frame subsets of data. It doesn't say FUN can be a character, and by(iris, iris$Species, summary) works as expected. Andy > From: Gabor Grothendieck > > I noticed that, unlike similar functions, 'by' does not use > match.

[Rd] by should use match.fun

I noticed that, unlike similar functions, 'by' does not use match.fun, e.g. > by(iris, iris$Species, "summary") Error in FUN(X[[1]], ...) : couldn't find function "FUN" The 'by' code should have an initial line of: FUN <- match.fun(FUN) __ R-devel@r-p

Re: [Rd] FW: Slovenian translation strings for R "installation programs"

On 6/12/05, Brian D Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > > On 6/11/05, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks for the translations. > > > > > > I am having some trouble with charsets (the installer has to be built > > > from file

Re: [Rd] FW: Slovenian translation strings for R "installation programs"

On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > On 6/11/05, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for the translations. > > > > I am having some trouble with charsets (the installer has to be built > > from files containing about 6 different ones). The version now in is your >