Re: runaway avocado

2021-02-11 Thread Cleber Rosa
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:59:23AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 2/11/21 8:21 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 18:47, Cleber Rosa wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 05:37:20PM +, Peter Maydell wrote: > >>> I wonder if we could have avocado run all our acceptance

Re: runaway avocado

2021-02-11 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 2/11/21 8:21 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 18:47, Cleber Rosa wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 05:37:20PM +, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> I wonder if we could have avocado run all our acceptance cases >>> under a 'ulimit -f' setting that restricts the amount of disk >>> spa

Re: runaway avocado

2021-02-11 Thread Peter Maydell
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 18:47, Cleber Rosa wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 05:37:20PM +, Peter Maydell wrote: > > I wonder if we could have avocado run all our acceptance cases > > under a 'ulimit -f' setting that restricts the amount of disk > > space they can use? That would restrict the dam

Re: runaway avocado

2021-02-11 Thread Cleber Rosa
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 05:37:20PM +, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 17:25, Cleber Rosa wrote: > > IIUC, this specic issue was caused by a runaway QEMU. Granted, it was > > started by an Avocado test. I've opened a bug report to look into the > > possibilities to mitigate or p

Re: runaway avocado

2021-02-11 Thread Peter Maydell
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 17:25, Cleber Rosa wrote: > IIUC, this specic issue was caused by a runaway QEMU. Granted, it was > started by an Avocado test. I've opened a bug report to look into the > possibilities to mitigate or prevent this from happening again: I wonder if we could have avocado ru

Re: runaway avocado

2021-02-11 Thread Cleber Rosa
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 07:23:22PM +, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 22:35, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > So, I somehow ended up with this process still running on my > > local machine after a (probably failed) 'make check-acceptance': > > > > petmay01 13710 99.7 3.7 2313448 123

Re: runaway avocado

2021-02-05 Thread Peter Maydell
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 22:35, Peter Maydell wrote: > > So, I somehow ended up with this process still running on my > local machine after a (probably failed) 'make check-acceptance': > > petmay01 13710 99.7 3.7 2313448 1235780 pts/16 Sl 16:10 378:00 > ./qemu-system-aarch64 -display none -vga non

Re: runaway avocado

2020-12-07 Thread John Snow
On 10/26/20 8:28 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:43:36PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: Cc'ing avocado-devel@ On 10/26/20 11:35 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: So, I somehow ended up with this process still running on my local machine after a (probably failed) 'make check-acce

Re: runaway avocado

2020-10-26 Thread Cleber Rosa
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:43:36PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Cc'ing avocado-devel@ > > On 10/26/20 11:35 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > > So, I somehow ended up with this process still running on my > > local machine after a (probably failed) 'make check-acceptance': > > > > petmay01 137

Re: runaway avocado

2020-10-26 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Cc'ing avocado-devel@ On 10/26/20 11:35 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: So, I somehow ended up with this process still running on my local machine after a (probably failed) 'make check-acceptance': petmay01 13710 99.7 3.7 2313448 1235780 pts/16 Sl 16:10 378:00 ./qemu-system-aarch64 -display none -vg

runaway avocado

2020-10-26 Thread Peter Maydell
So, I somehow ended up with this process still running on my local machine after a (probably failed) 'make check-acceptance': petmay01 13710 99.7 3.7 2313448 1235780 pts/16 Sl 16:10 378:00 ./qemu-system-aarch64 -display none -vga none -chardev socket,id=mon,path=/var/tmp/tmp5szft2yi/qemu-13290-m