Re: iotest40 problem

On Wed, Apr 6, 2022, 10:53 AM Li Zhang wrote: > On 3/31/22 16:46, John Snow wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 10:37 AM John Snow > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 6:47 AM Li Zhang > > wrote: > > > > On 3/31/2

Re: iotest40 problem

On 3/31/22 16:46, John Snow wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 10:37 AM John Snow > wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 6:47 AM Li Zhang mailto:lizh...@suse.de>> wrote: On 3/31/22 08:10, Hanna Reitz wrote: > On 29.03.22 18:49, Li Zhang wrote: >> Up

Re: iotest40 problem

On 3/31/22 16:37, John Snow wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 6:47 AM Li Zhang > wrote: On 3/31/22 08:10, Hanna Reitz wrote: > On 29.03.22 18:49, Li Zhang wrote: >> Update what I observed. >> >> It seems that aqmp is not stable when running test case

Re: iotest40 problem

On 3/31/22 16:46, John Snow wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 10:37 AM John Snow > wrote: On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 6:47 AM Li Zhang mailto:lizh...@suse.de>> wrote: On 3/31/22 08:10, Hanna Reitz wrote: > On 29.03.22 18:49, Li Zhang wrote: >> Up

Re: iotest40 problem

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 10:37 AM John Snow wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 6:47 AM Li Zhang wrote: > >> On 3/31/22 08:10, Hanna Reitz wrote: >> > On 29.03.22 18:49, Li Zhang wrote: >> >> Update what I observed. >> >> >> >> It seems that aqmp is not stable when running test cases. >> >> So I rev

Re: iotest40 problem

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 6:47 AM Li Zhang wrote: > On 3/31/22 08:10, Hanna Reitz wrote: > > On 29.03.22 18:49, Li Zhang wrote: > >> Update what I observed. > >> > >> It seems that aqmp is not stable when running test cases. > >> So I revert the patches as the following, iotest40/41 test cases work >

Re: iotest40 problem

On 3/31/22 08:10, Hanna Reitz wrote: On 29.03.22 18:49, Li Zhang wrote: Update what I observed. It seems that aqmp is not stable when running test cases. So I revert the patches as the following, iotest40/41 test cases work well. Thanks for bisecting.  I haven’t seen this problem before, so

Re: iotest40 problem

On 29.03.22 18:49, Li Zhang wrote: Update what I observed. It seems that aqmp is not stable when running test cases. So I revert the patches as the following, iotest40/41 test cases work well. Thanks for bisecting.  I haven’t seen this problem before, so I didn’t look into it; CC-ing John, p

Re: iotest40 problem

Update what I observed. It seems that aqmp is not stable when running test cases. So I revert the patches as the following, iotest40/41 test cases work well. commit 76cd358671e6b8e7c435ec65b1c44200254514a9 Author: John Snow Date: Tue Oct 26 13:56:12 2021 -0400 python, iotests: replac

Re: iotest40 problem

Hi, I backport some iotests patches to the tree and change timeout. It doesn't work. Sometimes, iotest41 also reports the errors. [ 1347s] +== [ 1347s] +ERROR: test_top_node_in_wrong_chain (__main__.TestSingleDrive) [ 1347s]

iotest40 problem

Hi, When I run the testsuit on our buidling system, it reports a timeout sometimes not always as the following. It couldn't connect qmp socket. Any ideas about this problem? [ 1989s] --- /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/qemu-6.2.0/tests/qemu-iotests/040.out [ 1989s] +++ 040.out.bad [ 1989s] @@ -