On 7/15/21 2:33 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
I have found myself wondering whether it would be a good idea for
decodetree to support some minimal syntax for defining constant-modifying
functions inline in the decode file, so that instead of writing
%imm4_16_p1 16:4 !function=plus_1
and then hav
I have found myself wondering whether it would be a good idea for
decodetree to support some minimal syntax for defining constant-modifying
functions inline in the decode file, so that instead of writing
%imm4_16_p1 16:4 !function=plus_1
and then having to define a "plus_1" function somewhere
