On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:55 AM Laurent Vivier wrote:
> We should add signal 63 here, but it's becoming not very clean.
https://golang.org/issue/33746 has some discussion of the issue. The
Go maintainers wanted to clean this up rather than just adding 63. The
patch is on ice right now because it w
Le 04/02/2020 à 01:03, Josh Kunz a écrit :
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 4:27 AM Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> This has been tested with Go (golang 1.10.1 linux/arm64, bionic) on x86_64
>> fedora 31. We can avoid the failure in this case allowing the unsupported
>> signals when we don't provide the "act" pa
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 4:27 AM Laurent Vivier wrote:
> This has been tested with Go (golang 1.10.1 linux/arm64, bionic) on x86_64
> fedora 31. We can avoid the failure in this case allowing the unsupported
> signals when we don't provide the "act" parameters to sigaction, only the
> "oldact" one.
FWIW, this removes the need for the target-specific code for Hexagon in
signal.c.
Thanks,
Taylor
PS Stay tuned for a Hexagon target patch series once this is merged.
> -Original Message-
> From: Laurent Vivier
> Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2020 6:28 AM
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc
