On 11/30/21 10:41, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> On 11/30/21 09:35, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Has there been a recent change as to how square brackets are encoded
>> within QOM names? I noticed that the output has changed here in the
>> "info qom-tree" output in qemu-system-m68k for the
On 30/11/2021 16:41, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 08:36, Mark Cave-Ayland
wrote:
Has there been a recent change as to how square brackets are encoded within QOM
names? I noticed that the output has changed here in the "info qom-tree" output
in
qemu-system-m68k for the q800 mach
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 08:36, Mark Cave-Ayland
wrote:
> Has there been a recent change as to how square brackets are encoded within
> QOM
> names? I noticed that the output has changed here in the "info qom-tree"
> output in
> qemu-system-m68k for the q800 machine.
>
> The q800 machine has a set
On 11/30/21 09:35, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Has there been a recent change as to how square brackets are encoded
> within QOM names? I noticed that the output has changed here in the
> "info qom-tree" output in qemu-system-m68k for the q800 machine.
>
> The q800 machine has a set of
Hi all,
Has there been a recent change as to how square brackets are encoded within QOM
names? I noticed that the output has changed here in the "info qom-tree" output in
qemu-system-m68k for the q800 machine.
The q800 machine has a set of 256 memory region aliases that used to appear in the
