On 21/10/22 3:37 am, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:32:06PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 08:14:19PM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
I had one concern, during recover we do not send any magic. As of now we
do not support multifd with postcopy so it shoul
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:32:06PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 08:14:19PM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
> > I had one concern, during recover we do not send any magic. As of now we
> do not support multifd with postcopy so it should be fine, we can do
> explict checking for n
On 19/10/22 2:30 am, Peter Xu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:51:12AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:18:28AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 05:15:35PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:38:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:51:12AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:18:28AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 05:15:35PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:38:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 01:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:18:28AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 05:15:35PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:38:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 01:06:00PM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
> > > > Hi Daniel,
> > > >
>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 05:15:35PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:38:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 01:06:00PM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > I was thinking for some solutions for this so wanted to discuss that
> >
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:38:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 01:06:00PM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > I was thinking for some solutions for this so wanted to discuss that before
> > going ahead. Also added Juan and Peter in loop.
> >
> > 1. E
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 01:06:00PM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I was thinking for some solutions for this so wanted to discuss that before
> going ahead. Also added Juan and Peter in loop.
>
> 1. Earlier i was thinking, on destination side as of now for default
> and multi-FD ch
Hi Daniel,
I was thinking for some solutions for this so wanted to discuss that before
going ahead. Also added Juan and Peter in loop.
1. Earlier i was thinking, on destination side as of now for default and
multi-FD channel first data to be sent is MAGIC_NUMBER and VERSION so may be we
can d
On 13/10/22 1:45 pm, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 01:23:40AM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Hope everyone is doing great. I have seen some live migration issues with
qemu-4.2 when using multiFD. Signature of issue is something like this.
2022-10-01T09:57:53.9728
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 01:23:40AM +0530, manish.mishra wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> Hope everyone is doing great. I have seen some live migration issues with
> qemu-4.2 when using multiFD. Signature of issue is something like this.
> 2022-10-01T09:57:53.972864Z qemu-kvm: failed to receive packet via m
Hi Everyone,
Hope everyone is doing great. I have seen some live migration issues with
qemu-4.2 when using multiFD. Signature of issue is something like this.
2022-10-01T09:57:53.972864Z qemu-kvm: failed to receive packet via multifd
channel 0: multifd: received packet magic 5145564d expected 11
12 matches
Mail list logo
