On 11/16/21 21:21, Luis Fernando Fujita Pires wrote:
From: Matheus K. Ferst
Hi Cédric,
The only change was the helper name that is now uppercase, so nothing new
here. The underlying cause is that dfp_finalize_decimal64 only sets
dfp->vt.VsrD(1) and set_dfp64 receives a pointer to the complete
From: Matheus K. Ferst
> Hi Cédric,
>
> The only change was the helper name that is now uppercase, so nothing new
> here. The underlying cause is that dfp_finalize_decimal64 only sets
> dfp->vt.VsrD(1) and set_dfp64 receives a pointer to the complete struct.
>
> But since set_dfp64 also only acc
On 10/11/2021 05:18, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
Hello Luis,
Coverity found a couple of issues which seem related to the DFP patchset.
Could you please take a look ?
Thanks,
C.
Forwarded Message
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for QEMU
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 22:09
Hello Luis,
Coverity found a couple of issues which seem related to the DFP patchset.
Could you please take a look ?
Thanks,
C.
Forwarded Message
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for QEMU
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 22:09:40 +
From: scan-ad...@coverity.com
To: c.
