Hi,
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 10:43:06AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Bringing this thread back from the dead, since I had an
> in-person discussion on a key question below at KVM Forum this
> year and want to record it here.
Thanks for that.
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:19:24PM +0200, Vict
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 01:36:49PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
[...]
>> > TL;DR: I think you can re-add the documentation comments to
>> > the Golang code generator, declare the resulting code as being
>> > "MIT-0 AND GPL-2.0-or-la
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 01:36:49PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > Bringing this thread back from the dead, since I had an in-person
> > discussion on a key question below at KVM Forum this year and want
> > to record it here.
>
> [...]
>
> > To recap the situ
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 01:06:36PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 01:36:49PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> >
> > > Bringing this thread back from the dead, since I had an in-person
> > > discussion on a key question below at KVM Forum
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> Bringing this thread back from the dead, since I had an in-person
> discussion on a key question below at KVM Forum this year and want
> to record it here.
[...]
> To recap the situation
>
> * The license of the code generator itself does not determine the
>lic
Bringing this thread back from the dead, since I had an in-person
discussion on a key question below at KVM Forum this year and want
to record it here.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:19:24PM +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the second iteration of RFC v1:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 01:53:51PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Victor Toso writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 08:46:34AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> >> I've commented in detail to the single patches, just a couple of
> >> additional points.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 17,
Victor Toso writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 08:46:34AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>> I've commented in detail to the single patches, just a couple of
>> additional points.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:19:24PM +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
>> > * 7) Flat structs by removing embed typ
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 05:29:26PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Victor Toso writes:
>
> > Hi Markus,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 09:15:53AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Victor Toso writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > This is the second iteration of RFC v1:
> >> > https:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 08:46:34AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> I've commented in detail to the single patches, just a couple of
> additional points.
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:19:24PM +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
> > * 7) Flat structs by removing embed types. Discussion with Andrea
> >
I've commented in detail to the single patches, just a couple of
additional points.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:19:24PM +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
> * 7) Flat structs by removing embed types. Discussion with Andrea
> Thread:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-05/msg01590.htm
Victor Toso writes:
> Hi Markus,
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 09:15:53AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Victor Toso writes:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This is the second iteration of RFC v1:
>> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-04/msg00226.html
>> >
>> >
>> > # What this is a
Hi Markus,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 09:15:53AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Victor Toso writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the second iteration of RFC v1:
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-04/msg00226.html
> >
> >
> > # What this is about?
> >
> > To generate a simple G
Victor Toso writes:
> Hi,
>
> This is the second iteration of RFC v1:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-04/msg00226.html
>
>
> # What this is about?
>
> To generate a simple Golang interface that could communicate with QEMU
> over QMP. The Go code that is generated is meant t
Hi,
This is the second iteration of RFC v1:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-04/msg00226.html
# What this is about?
To generate a simple Golang interface that could communicate with QEMU
over QMP. The Go code that is generated is meant to be used as the bare
bones to exchang
15 matches
Mail list logo
