On 09/06/2022 10:56, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 15:34, Lucas Mateus Castro(alqotel)
wrote:
---
Currently there's a disagreement between the checkpatch code and the
documentation, this RFC just changes the checkpatch to match the
documentation.
But there was a discussion in 20
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 15:34, Lucas Mateus Castro(alqotel)
wrote:
>
> The QEMU documentation mentions that lines should be up to 80
> characters and that the script checkpatch will warn at 100 characters,
> but the script warns at 80 characters and throw and error at 90, so
> this commit changes to
The QEMU documentation mentions that lines should be up to 80
characters and that the script checkpatch will warn at 100 characters,
but the script warns at 80 characters and throw and error at 90, so
this commit changes to warn at 100.
As to why extend, the argument that resulted in the change of
